Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 6, 2020

Created

Sat Dec 14 20:25:17 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@daveweigel @StuPolitics @SeanTrende It's hard to imagine Biden not making *some* kind of last stand in SC, where Bloomberg isn't even on the ballot. If Biden wins SC, then he's back in the game. If he loses, well, Bernie has won the first *4* and at that point he's winning the nom so who cares about Bloomberg. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 14, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Not to accuse this article of bothsidesism but the phrase "both sides" literally appears 4 times in it (once as a quotation). https://t.co/AgaeURsZP1 https://t.co/0eGeD3I6UX — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 14, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@daveweigel @StuPolitics @SeanTrende I'm just saying I think people are underrating the unique position for Biden in SC, which could help prevent the establishment split. Bloomberg not's on the ballot there. Buttigieg's weak there. Harris dropped out. I guess if there's a Booker surge pre-SC that gets interesting. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 14, 2019 Hibernated