Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 3, 2020

Created

Wed Dec 11 19:59:11 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

There were some complicated reasons for this. Party elites didn't love Cruz. Rubio picked up some of the surge that "should" have gone to Cruz, then blew it in the debate. And Trump may have created some ambiguity in the outcome by accusing Cruz of fraud. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 11, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Iowa 2016 had a lot of elements that you might have expected to produce a big swing in national polls. It was a decent-sized upset for one thing, relative to surveys in Iowa that showed Trump ahead of Cruz. But it didn't move the needle all that much. — PolitiTweet.org

A major argument for Trump's potential vulnerability in the leadup to the 2016 nominating season was that an early… https://t.co/NywLU0rYCM

Posted Dec. 11, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

But there's not just uncertainty in the outcome for Iowa; there's also uncertainty in whether the bounce Iowa produces will be large, small, or (unlikely) nonexistent. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 11, 2019 Hibernated