Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 26, 2020

Created

Wed Nov 27 19:22:05 +0000 2019

Likes

1,306

Retweets

138

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

5) Warren had a few mediocre general election polls that were much discussed in the press; 6) Last, and certainly not least, the track record of what happens to women in Democratic primaries once they're perceived as frontrunners also needs to be considered. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 27, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

2. Some rich donors/party elites signaled they weren't happy with Warren; 3) Bernie went back on the trail and got some high-profile endorsements & has been sharp; 4a) Buttigieg went after Warren from the right; 4b) Buttigieg began to get more press coverage citing rising polls; — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 27, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@SeanTrende @hezaproject @rp_griffin Of course you can infer state-level estimates from a combination of national polls, state demographics, and other priors, manipulated in various ways. Our models have done this for years. It's a lot better than nothing but it usually sucks as compared to actual state polls. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 27, 2019 Hibernated