Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 24, 2020

Created

Fri Nov 22 21:56:06 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@philipaklein That should be a testable hypothesis, no? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 22, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@NickRiccardi Steyer is a meaningful precedent. And Clinton's huge advertising advantage over Trump is a fairly meaningful precedent too. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 22, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

I don't think I'd want to tie my "here's proof of the corrupting influence of money in politics" thesis to Bloomberg's presidential run, because (1a) a vanity presidential campaign is probably one of the *least* effective ways a billionaire can spend money to influence politics… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 23, 2019 Hibernated