Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 14, 2020

Created

Sat Nov 09 23:23:38 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@TylerDinucci @williamjordann I mean my subjective view—from talking to friends in finance, etc.—is that there's something a little bit irrational about it. Which certainly could include sexism. But, the fact that she's perceived as having a good chance to win is the most obvious explanation. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 9, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@williamjordann The Elizabeth Warren freakout commenced when people began to believe that she was the frontrunner. So the null hypothesis is just that the billionaires think she could actually win and are not as worried about Bernie. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 9, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

First poll since Bloomberg semi-entered the race shows: —Him at just 4% —Worst net favorables in D field —Biden still with a clear lead; no particular evidence Biden impacted more than others Not exactly the "seismic disruption" that some predicted. https://t.co/WrN3yjhUol — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 10, 2019 Hibernated