Profile Image

Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked April 4, 2020

Created

Sun Oct 20 15:12:10 +0000 2019

Likes

3,917

Retweets

673

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Where's the evidence that Trump's digital ads were very effective? Most of it seems to be a lot of bragging by Brad Parscale, amplified by media that would like you to ignore more obvious explanations for how Trump won, such as obsessive media coverage of Clinton's emails. — PolitiTweet.org

Jon Favreau @jonfavs

No. Yes, she spent more, but largely on television. Trump’s targeted, digital spending was very effective in ‘16 an… https://t.co/lnAMDnOtLn

Posted Oct. 20, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

RT @ABCPolitics: Do endorsements really make a difference? "I buy that endorsements matter when there's a consensus of them that point cle… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 20, 2019 Retweet Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

It's not baffling at all! It has an incredibly simple explanation, in fact, although one that implicitly undercuts the article's thesis: There's nothing magic about digital ad spending. — PolitiTweet.org

rat king @MikeIsaac

big ol piece on trump backers dominating FB political ad spend from @AllMattNYT and @kevinroose this graph right… https://t.co/i7oBn7Fyha

Posted Oct. 20, 2019 Hibernated