Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 4, 2020

Created

Wed Oct 16 23:44:52 +0000 2019

Likes

1,855

Retweets

260

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

My understanding is that "Medicare for All" was deliberately a fairly ambiguous phrase until recently, which was inclusive of a range of proposals including what you might now call a public option or Medicare-for-All-Who-Want-It. — PolitiTweet.org

Buttigieg and Harris have both shifted their position on Medicare for All and proposed their own health care plans.… https://t.co/WR60RdRtXb

Posted Oct. 16, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So now they're trying to act like it was just a matter of question wording that their generic ballot poll was 10 points (!!!) too high on Republicans? (Even though they used extremely conventional question wording?) Nope. That's just par for the course given how their polls lean. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 16, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So if Buttigieg had said "I support eliminating private insurance" or "I don't think a public option is going far enough" or "I support Bernie's plan", then yeah, he's flip-flopped. But there's a lot of revisionist history here about what M4A meant, especially circa 2018. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 16, 2019 Hibernated