Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 4, 2020

Created

Tue Oct 15 21:30:24 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@JamesFallows Well I mean probably not, but it depends on whether probably means a 3% chance or an 0.3% chance or an 0.03% chance or whatever, and I don't have strong opinions about that re: Steyer. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

It probably makes sense for Steyer to go after Biden. He doesn't have much to lose—he's a real long-shot for the nomination, he isn't going to be the VP. And probably the only scenarios where he wins the nomination involve Biden faltering. — PolitiTweet.org

Democrats have a collective action problem right now where it doesn't make sense for any one candidate to go hard a… https://t.co/VE05llB2jp

Posted Oct. 15, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Also, being the designated asker-of-tough-questions/teller-of-tough-truths could get Steyer more media coverage, when there's otherwise not a hell of a lot of reason to cover him. He could also go after Biden/Bernie on age, for instance. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 15, 2019 Hibernated