Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 19, 2020

Created

Sun Sep 22 02:02:16 +0000 2019

Likes

4,985

Retweets

591

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

You know who had diverse support? De Blasio, that's who. He had 0% among whites, 0% among blacks, 0% among Hispanics, 0% among men and 0% among women. 0% among college graduates and 0% among non-college voters. 0% among evangelicals and 0% among LGBTQs. Hard to get more diverse. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 22, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Put another way, Sanders is doing worse among blacks and Hispanics than in 2016, but he's doing *much* worse among whites, among whom he overperformed last time. That's the sense in which his support is more diverse, not in his actually having made inroads with voters of color. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 22, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Nationally, Sanders is getting just 9% of Clinton 2016 voters. (And apparently, 0% of Clinton caucusgoers in Iowa, per the new Selzer poll.) Warren draws about evenly from both the Clinton and Sanders 2016 camps. https://t.co/LCrYsuNwhm — PolitiTweet.org

Warren bridging the Hillary-Bernie divide. I recall @NateSilver538 had some data like this.... https://t.co/5edvREDc3k

Posted Sept. 22, 2019 Hibernated