Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 19, 2020

Created

Thu Aug 15 20:18:37 +0000 2019

Likes

1,158

Retweets

118

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Democrats would be big favorites in those specials but they aren't necessarily slam dunks, as Martha Coakley learned. Plus, being down a Senate vote for your first 100 days or whatever is not trivial. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 15, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

If we're talking about the consequences of candidates running for president instead of Senate, probably worth mentioning that Warren or Bernie winning would result in GOP governors appointing their replacement for the 1st couple months of their term, followed by a special elex. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 15, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

I agree in principle on the same-party appointee thing but the the last time Massachusetts Democrats tried to monkey around with special elections laws in an opportunistic way, it resulted in Scott Brown winning. — PolitiTweet.org

Massachusetts Democrats could just change the law again to require a same-party appointee (really every state shoul… https://t.co/lBfjCVaKzC

Posted Aug. 15, 2019 Hibernated