Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Feb. 4, 2020

Created

Tue May 14 19:51:17 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

There are various draft value charts, and they say the 2/3 is slightly better than taking your chances, as a default. But Zion is much better No. 1 pick than normal. But also, the No. 4/5 picks in this draft are pretty weak compared to normal. https://t.co/25qhUEC1aC — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 14, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

So I'm *pretty* sure the majority here is wrong and that you'd take the guaranteed 2/3 if you could get it, but it's close. https://t.co/1GyYfvw9t3 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 14, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

But the thing is, the Knicks have only a 14% chance of Zion, and a 60% chance of the No. 4 or 5. As good as Zion is, it would probably be worth giving up the 14% chance to avoid the 60% chance, and lock in Morant or Barrett instead. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 14, 2019 Hibernated