Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 15, 2020

Created

Thu May 02 19:55:43 +0000 2019

Likes

239

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

I should probably re-up this now that there *really are* 20 Democrats running. https://t.co/J6ciG3x14h — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 2, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

"Optional Medicare-for-all", i.e. a public option, polls very well, though, and would presumably have fewer problems with people having to give up their current insurance. https://t.co/67wNyYaoG9 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 2, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

The key takeaway is there's a fairly strong (& intuitive) empirical relationship between how many candidates run, and how much of the vote the top candidate gets across all primaries and caucuses. In a fields this large, you probably wouldn't expect the top candidate to get 50%+. https://t.co/zJunTDyGs1 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 2, 2019 Hibernated