Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 16, 2019

Created

Sun Apr 14 15:42:23 +0000 2019

Likes

748

Retweets

118

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Not prompted by anything in particular, but I continue to think Democrats' extremely proportional delegate allocation rules are a big problem for them, making it much more likely that a nominee must chosen at the convention. You probably want some winner-take-all delegates. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 14, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Loebsack quite possibly the only member of Congress elected because of online poker players, who donated to his campaign in significant amounts after his opponent, the Republican incumbent Jim Leach, was instrumental in GOP efforts to pass anti-online-gambling legislation. — PolitiTweet.org

Rep. Dave Loebsack (D)'s retirement moves #IA02 from Likely Dem to Toss Up at @CookPolitical. He's one of four rema… https://t.co/RCqptYzfFN

Posted April 12, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

If I were designing a system, I'd have it staggered, so something like: February states: 20% of delegates go to state winner; rest are proportional with a 15% qualifying theshold. March: 40% winner take all April: 60% WTA May: 80% WTA June: 100% WTA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 14, 2019 Hibernated