Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Nov. 27, 2019

Created

Mon Mar 25 15:26:36 +0000 2019

Likes

1,438

Retweets

170

Source

Twitter Web Client

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

What that means to me: interest in Buttigieg is fairly organic and is *not* especially media-driven. There are various critiques you can make about e.g. Beto's media coverage, and none of them apply very well to Buttigieg. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 25, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Per https://t.co/jHk0e1EAF0, Elizabeth Warren has gotten 5x more media coverage than Pete Buttigieg over the past 30 days, but Pete Buttigieg has gotten 1.3x more Google search traffic. https://t.co/mEHVnHx52o — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 25, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@MattGrossmann OK, but Warren has gotten far more news coverage and all it took was one evening of programming to spark a huge amount of interest in Buttigieg. That seems pretty organic to me? It's not like e.g. Hickenlooper or Schultz took good advantage of their town halls. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 25, 2019 Hibernated