Nate Silver

@NateSilver538 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 11, 2019

Created

Sat Oct 27 13:55:02 +0000 2018

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

@MattGlassman312 @Redistrict @nathanlgonzales There's essentially no (~1%) chance of a D Senate + R House, so you c… https://t.co/flx5KP82L0 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Oct. 27, 2018 Hibernated

Preceded By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Instead of putting a runner on 2nd to expedite the resolution of extra innings, gradually expand the amount of fair… https://t.co/Mxmplq334K — PolitiTweet.org

That should count

Posted Oct. 27, 2018 Hibernated

Followed By

Nate Silver @NateSilver538

Our model's hypothesis is basically that the influx of D cash makes a lot of races that might ordinarily be "Lean R… https://t.co/jcGhJt46h7 — PolitiTweet.org

"Democrats are set to spend $143 million on television advertising in House races, compared with $86 million for th… https://t.co/n2Tdqt61Qv

Posted Oct. 27, 2018 Hibernated