Zack Beauchamp

@zackbeauchamp ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Feb. 5, 2021

Created

Thu Jan 14 16:50:25 +0000 2021

Likes

130

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

12. Here's the last substantive section, which is really a con. Shapiro is arguing for "neutral standards" to "unite the country" while quite literally arguing for division — that Republicans are justified in seeing Democrats as evil and opposing impeachment to spite them. https://t.co/Y6RnUMjJpK — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2021

Preceded By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

11. Raskin's objections were pro forma and without support from a Senate member, so they didn't trigger debate. And the reputable First Amendment lawyers I've spoken to say there is a real case that Trump did incitement; Shapiro links out to a piece by Andy McCarthy, a crank. https://t.co/ccWiLTc1mm — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2021

Followed By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

13. But this is Shapiro's shtick. Out of one side of his mouth, he positions himself as a high-minded intellectual. Out of the other side, he offers up the most divisive conservative red meat imaginable. Some examples I compiled a bit ago: https://t.co/6RL1r3HK6v — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2021