Zack Beauchamp

@zackbeauchamp ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated No

Last Checked Feb. 5, 2021

Created

Thu Jan 14 16:50:24 +0000 2021

Likes

105

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

11. Raskin's objections were pro forma and without support from a Senate member, so they didn't trigger debate. And the reputable First Amendment lawyers I've spoken to say there is a real case that Trump did incitement; Shapiro links out to a piece by Andy McCarthy, a crank. https://t.co/ccWiLTc1mm — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2021

Preceded By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

10. Now, here's the next section. Virtually every claim in this is either dishonest or false. In 2018, Abrams didn't try to overturn the election, telling supporters that "the law currently allows no further viable remedy" for an election she felt (justifiably!) was unfair. https://t.co/2jutpC2bsJ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2021

Followed By

Zack Beauchamp @zackbeauchamp

12. Here's the last substantive section, which is really a con. Shapiro is arguing for "neutral standards" to "unite the country" while quite literally arguing for division — that Republicans are justified in seeing Democrats as evil and opposing impeachment to spite them. https://t.co/Y6RnUMjJpK — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 14, 2021