Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 29, 2022

Created

Wed Jun 09 12:49:09 +0000 2021

Likes

125

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

8. The DOJ also makes clear it is not arguing that Trump would be immunized from anything he said. But, citing Ballenger, argues the rape allegation was a matter of "concern" to Trump's constituents. This is the fatal flaw in the DOJ's argument https://t.co/ZGWkGsBS4W — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 9, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

7. The Ballenger court realized allowing a Congressman to say whatever they wanted to press & be immunized was a bad idea So it said its ruling was limited to the facts of the case Specifically, his separation was a matter of "concern" to constiutents https://t.co/ZGWkGsBS4W — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 9, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

9. The standard the DOJ is creating would immunize everything a president said to the press because a president has 300M+ constituents and everything about their life is of "concern" to someone The DOJ is doing exactly what it says it should not do https://t.co/ZGWkGsBS4W — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 9, 2021 Hibernated