Judd Legum

@JuddLegum ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Aug. 29, 2022

Created

Wed Jun 09 12:47:20 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

7. The Ballenger court realized allowing a Congressman to say whatever they wanted to press & be immunized was a bad idea So it said its ruling was limited to the facts of the case Specifically, his separation was a matter of "concern" to constiutents https://t.co/ZGWkGsBS4W — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 9, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

6. In Ballenger, the court found that the Congressman was acting with the scope of his employment because answering questions from the media is part of a Congressman's job. But here is where everything breaks down for the DOJ's argument https://t.co/ZGWkGsBS4W — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 9, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Judd Legum @JuddLegum

8. The DOJ also makes clear it is not arguing that Trump would be immunized from anything he said. But, citing Ballenger, argues the rape allegation was a matter of "concern" to Trump's constituents. This is the fatal flaw in the DOJ's argument https://t.co/ZGWkGsBS4W — PolitiTweet.org

Posted June 9, 2021 Hibernated