Tweet by @mattyglesias

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

I think a good way to balance these considerations is to allow unlimited density on all residential parcels in all parts of the state (and every other state), and then if people decide they don’t want to live in them because of water or fires or whatever they don’t have to. — PolitiTweet.org

@mattyglesias I’m all for building more housing, but one needs to question if it should be built in CA in the first… https://t.co/KHMRjejH1D

Posted Sept. 4, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

@kimmaicutler That’s the dream — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Sept. 4, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

Yeah I think if you own some land and it’s residentially zoned and you want to build a residential structure on it that’s safe, you should be able to make it whatever size you want and with however many units or parking spaces or whatever that you want. Freedom! — PolitiTweet.org

@mattyglesias “In all parts of every state” I’ve often wondered if you meant this literally, and I guess you do.

Posted Sept. 4, 2022 Hibernated