Matthew Yglesias

@mattyglesias ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Jan. 19, 2023

Created

Wed Aug 17 13:27:11 +0000 2022

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

It’s a strength of the bill that it is agnostic on technology. I know people on Twitter love to argue about which hypothetical future technological breakthrough (renewable storage, advanced nuclear, advanced geothermal, CCS, CCR, etc) is most likely but in truth nobody knows. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2022 Hibernated

Preceded By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

Good thread here to which I should add we should always be thinking about what are the actual tradeoffs in play. Does money for CCS crowd out funding for needed renewables projects via an accounting logic or does it crowd it in via a “count the votes” logic? Clearly the latter. — PolitiTweet.org

Provocative piece in today's @nytimes criticizing spending on CCS in the new climate bill. There are parts I agree… https://t.co/ZZeRf4yr9I

Posted Aug. 17, 2022 Hibernated

Followed By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

But while we can and should reduce emissions a lot with existing technologies, a world of sustainable energy abundance is going to need some new ones and it is wise to invest broadly here because it’s impossible to know what will work at scale. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Aug. 17, 2022 Hibernated