Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias
The issue is supply constriction’s costs fall heavily on the most vulnerable, just like with a carbon tax, except instead of generating revenue the government can use to mitigate the harms it generates windfall profits for existing fossil fuel players. — PolitiTweet.org
Yevgeny Shrago @yevshrag
The piece dismisses supply side restriction as moralism. I'd call it acknowledgment of the millions and billions wh… https://t.co/FhgrcwTAtA
