Profile Image

Matthew Yglesias

@mattyglesias ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked April 14, 2021

Created

Mon Apr 05 13:12:03 +0000 2021

Likes

145

Retweets

4

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

It’s really a very simple idea when you think about it — residential parcels should be developed exactly as densely as people want, but definitely no denser than that. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 5, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

I think a good non-fraught way to resolve this dispute would be to say that there should be no restrictions whatsoever (no parking minimum, no height maximum, no FAR maximum, no lot occupancy maximum, etc) on the density allowed in residential areas. — PolitiTweet.org

Inga Saffron @IngaSaffron

The debate over density has grown so fraught. Here are some thoughts about what works and what doesn’t. https://t.co/TK0KY8BEJ2

Posted April 5, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

RT @koaleszenz: @mattyglesias It's even worse than that. 20% of the units are affordable. And the opponents literally can't save the dog pa… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted April 5, 2021 Retweet Hibernated