Matthew Yglesias

@mattyglesias ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked March 20, 2021

Created

Sat Jan 02 15:30:31 +0000 2021

Likes

392

Retweets

Source

Twitter for iPhone

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

The idea (which to be clear I don’t endorse but just want to explain) is that forcing a vote will cause a bunch of Democrats to vote “no” and then they can be identified as enemies of the people to be defeated in future primaries. — PolitiTweet.org

What's the best explanation of how forcing a vote in the House on Medicare4All is a good thing for the future of th… https://t.co/X6G8oaWE1j

Posted Jan. 2, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

100 percent of the relevant tradeoff is between preserving wild land and using land for natural resource extraction (mining, logging, ranching, etc.) — the book doesn't take a position on that tradeoff, but I am not proposing we turn national parks into new subdivisions. — PolitiTweet.org

@mattyglesias Is it reasonable to ask how much wild land/undeveloped land you envision in this scenario?

Posted Jan. 2, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

In general there is a group of people who‘ve convinced themselves that factional infighting is more important (or just more fun!) than partisan politics, and this is a gambit that comes from inside that worldview. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 2, 2021 Hibernated