Matthew Yglesias

@mattyglesias ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked April 21, 2019

Created

Sun Mar 24 18:33:51 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

TweetDeck

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

These were not fully exclusive interpretations, of course. It would have been possible in principle for Russia to help Trump win *by exposing damning information about Clinton* — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 24, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

One possible way to think of them was as whistleblower leaks that contained damning revelations of misconduct. Another was to think of them as an effort by a foreign government to help Donald Trump win the election. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 24, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

Matthew Yglesias @mattyglesias

But in practice there was a big interpretive dispute over the whole thing. Most of the people who spend the 2016 campaign season extensively covering the emails were disinclined to see them as the fruits of a pro-Trump influence campaign directed from Moscow. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted March 24, 2019 Hibernated