U.S. EPA

@EPA ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 25, 2022

Created

Wed Nov 13 15:21:48 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

U.S. EPA @EPA

To say politically appointed agency administrator's would have wide-ranging discretion over which studies to accept/reject is completely false. The proposal requires transparency & gives the discretion to use studies when information isn't available. This should be the exception. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

U.S. EPA @EPA

Science transparency does not weaken science, quite the contrary. By requiring transparency, scientists will be required to publish hypothesis & experimental data for other scientists to review & discuss, requiring the science to withstand skepticism & peer review. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

U.S. EPA @EPA

The NYT published story: EPA to Limit Science Used to Write Public Health Rules. This has numerous errors & is based on leaked preliminary, draft documents that are not accurate & is not the final text submitted to OMB last week for interagency review. https://t.co/1B95gXBfPg — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated