U.S. EPA

@EPA ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Oct. 25, 2022

Created

Wed Nov 13 15:17:05 +0000 2019

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

U.S. EPA @EPA

Science transparency does not weaken science, quite the contrary. By requiring transparency, scientists will be required to publish hypothesis & experimental data for other scientists to review & discuss, requiring the science to withstand skepticism & peer review. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Preceded By

U.S. EPA @EPA

It is important to ensure science underlying EPA decisions is transparent & available for evaluation by the public & stakeholders. The proposed Science Transparency rule seeks to ensure science & data underlying EPA’s actions are publicly available for independent validation — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated

Followed By

U.S. EPA @EPA

To say politically appointed agency administrator's would have wide-ranging discretion over which studies to accept/reject is completely false. The proposal requires transparency & gives the discretion to use studies when information isn't available. This should be the exception. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 13, 2019 Hibernated