Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked May 7, 2021

Created

Thu Feb 11 02:22:51 +0000 2021

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter for Android

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@chadfelixg They had free will and should be prosecuted. But if an angry mob of my most loyal readers was gathered around you, and I could a) keep quiet b) denounce you to then at that moment, you'd prefer a, yes? And if I did b you might take issue with me, yes? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

No, the standard is, *if a violent mob forms around a person & you broadcast a message to many of them at that moment denouncing him, that is dangerous*, which seems reasonable in general, & especially reasonable when applied to the charismatic leader most beloved by that mob! — PolitiTweet.org

Damning of what, though? Millions read that tweet. I read that tweet. You probably read that tweet. As much as Tru… https://t.co/tf5nAVbRKu

Posted Feb. 11, 2021 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

This is bonkers. Drunk driving should be stigmatized. I have *never, ever* done it. But Bruce Springsteen blew a .02! https://t.co/VsBkmGKl7p The headline should be Tenth Avenue Frame Up? — PolitiTweet.org

How The Post could cover Bruce Springsteen's DWI bust https://t.co/nJWaE9ojbk https://t.co/W4lZctjQHw

Posted Feb. 11, 2021 Hibernated