Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked May 7, 2021

Created

Thu Feb 11 02:16:03 +0000 2021

Likes

55

Retweets

4

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

No, the standard is, *if a violent mob forms around a person & you broadcast a message to many of them at that moment denouncing him, that is dangerous*, which seems reasonable in general, & especially reasonable when applied to the charismatic leader most beloved by that mob! — PolitiTweet.org

Chad Felix Greene @chadfelixg

Damning of what, though? Millions read that tweet. I read that tweet. You probably read that tweet. As much as Tru… https://t.co/tf5nAVbRKu

Posted Feb. 11, 2021 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

RT @ebruenig: so the formula we have here is: take a platform optimized to elicit people's most ill-considered gut reactions in the shortes… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2021 Retweet Deleted Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@chadfelixg They had free will and should be prosecuted. But if an angry mob of my most loyal readers was gathered around you, and I could a) keep quiet b) denounce you to then at that moment, you'd prefer a, yes? And if I did b you might take issue with me, yes? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Feb. 11, 2021 Hibernated