Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Sat May 30 01:40:56 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@emilycrockett @ewarren I have no objection to people who accurately convey Trump's words and then analyze what, in their estimation, those words are intended to convey, beyond their denotation. I reject the anti-journalistic premise that insisting on the initial precision is to give racism a pass. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@emilycrockett @ewarren Trump's awfulness and the abhorrence of his actions don't change the fact that a dearth of precision by his critics weaken their critique. And Warren's critique was inaccurate . It should therefore not be our model of how to do it, if efficacy is part of our concern — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@emilycrockett @ewarren The question you pose is a good one. But the question posed was not "what was REALLY in Trump's heart and mind." It was, did the speaker––Warren,in this case––accurately convey Trump's words before analyzing them or not. She failed that test. Any good editor could've improved — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated