Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No

Hibernated Yes

Last Checked Dec. 23, 2020

Created

Sat May 30 01:22:41 +0000 2020

Likes

Retweets

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@emilycrockett @ewarren Trump's awfulness and the abhorrence of his actions don't change the fact that a dearth of precision by his critics weaken their critique. And Warren's critique was inaccurate . It should therefore not be our model of how to do it, if efficacy is part of our concern — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@emilycrockett @ewarren No Emily, it's obviously not fine. I decried it today in The Atlantic https://t.co/HvnaBeXw5U And I repeatedly said in previous Tweets that it is not fine. So why would you jump to that strawman nonsequitir? — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@emilycrockett @ewarren I have no objection to people who accurately convey Trump's words and then analyze what, in their estimation, those words are intended to convey, beyond their denotation. I reject the anti-journalistic premise that insisting on the initial precision is to give racism a pass. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted May 30, 2020 Hibernated