Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf

@conor64 ↗

Deleted No
Hibernated Yes
Last Checked June 10, 2020

Created

Tue Jan 07 22:25:15 +0000 2020

Likes

23

Retweets

7

Source

Twitter Web App

View Raw Data

JSON Data

View on Twitter

Likely Available
Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

I agree with much of this--lots of the pieces have value, the collection asks us to consider slavery's impact on modern life, lots of beautiful writing, etc.--but that the "true founding" claim is "least interesting" doesn't make it unimportant, as the ed materials underscore. — PolitiTweet.org

Jessica Marie Johnson @jmjafrx

You don't have to agree 1619 is the beginning (as I don't), but I actually think that's the least interesting thing… https://t.co/oLbxtg91Ij

Posted Jan. 7, 2020 Hibernated

Preceded By

Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

@rachelshelden @jmjafrx @TheAtlantic I don't get this claim. My piece cites lots of people who treat the 1619 Project with respect and explicitly note the value of parts of it even as they criticize others. That characterizes the Phillip Magness piece, which I flagged as especially good, as well as my own piece — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 7, 2020 Hibernated

Followed By

Profile Image

Conor Friedersdorf @conor64

RT @AdamSerwer: US “nationalists” seem to not understand that other countries also have nationalisms and hardliners who use external threat… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Jan. 7, 2020 Retweet Hibernated