Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 31 of 192.
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: I had a small unforeseen delay here, and I am hosting far too many people tonight. I will get back to this ASAP, but in the… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Laches clearly wasn’t indicated in the signature matching claim. https://t.co/Mt7JkShQxA — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: If they struck the illegal ballots prorata, Lake would have won. ILLEGAL ballots, mind you. https://t.co/0Ufe3fwOMq — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Now we get into signature matching, which is the last thing in the appeal I will focus on for this thread. Defendants argue… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: “Maricopa’s violation of law constitutes misconduct under A.R.S. §16-672(a)(1). Further, these violations also render at le… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: “Had Maricopa followed Arizona’s CoC rules, they would have had an exact count of EDDB ballots delivered to MCTEC on Electi… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: When I analyzed the transcript, I touched upon how the defense purposefully broke into witness answers to misstate what the… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: The trial court misrepresented expert testimony, and the CoC issues violated AZ election law. https://t.co/cDLjdvCPI3 — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: It defies credulity. Seriously. https://t.co/5eDlxYgeg1 — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: “Hey, Jarrett, I have all of these 19” ballot images on 20” paper that needed to be duped. Can I have those dupes?” Jarre… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Here is what I think makes it worse. Jarrett was the one WITH PARIKH during inspection. He was the one WITH PARIKH when thi… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Additionally, they IGNORED the contradictory testimony by Jarrett, who only changed his tune AFTER their expert testified.… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: The printer issues were the sole cause of the Election Day issues which disenfranchised voters, overwhelmingly republican o… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: However they failed, adequate testing would have prevented the issues; testing they CLEARLY didn’t do as required by law. h… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: They make the claim here again that the printer errors were caused by intentional misconduct. They proved this at trial. Th… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: What would stop fraud in elections then, if the requirement would be to come up with an exact number of fraudulent votes ea… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Next, even though they *did* prove outcome determinative issues, the courts interpretation of that is INCORRECT, otherwise… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: The lower court erred by requiring “felonious conduct” rather than “outcome altering” or “outcome clouding” impacts; which… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: That is important, and powerful. Courts do EVERYTHING based on precedent, interpretation, and the law. If this very court h… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Under the interpretation of the law, the plaintiff showed that the number of non-compliant ballots vastly surpasses the mar… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: The trial court erred in it’s interpretation of “misconduct” as to intentionality, but the appellate court has said differe… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: They discuss why the “clear and convincing” standard doesn’t apply to *all* election lawsuits, and dive into instances wher… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: The trial court rejected expert testimony because it provided a “range” that suppressed turnout would have effected the vot… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: We will now get in to the legal reasons that the judge made an error in his decision to withhold relief. Plaintiff argues… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: The standard by which the appellate court must decide: https://t.co/PqwUMT6DgJ — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Here are the issues the appellate court needs to work through. Notice, included are other counts the judge dismissed in the… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: They then introduce the signature matching issues and their importance, to get into the legal argument on laches shortly. h… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Maricopa and Richer couldn’t account for 15k ballots that Runbeck reported tallied. That is documented via HIS email. That… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Richer also lied under oath. No CoC forms were created at MCTEC prior to transporting ballots to Runbeck, and no documents… — PolitiTweet.org
Wendy Rogers @WendyRogersAZ
RT @tracybeanz: Chain of Custody was NOT followed. All ballots are required by law to be counted at MCTEC, and Richer testified there are t… — PolitiTweet.org
