Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 92 of 162.
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @Jim_Jordan: We asked Amb. Volker, Special Envoy to Ukraine, “Did @POTUS ever withhold a meeting with President Zelensky... until the Uk… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Democrats and the media are seizing on paragraph five of Sondland's update, where he tells Mr. Yermak the aid may not be released without an anti-corruption statement. Even *if* you think this is nefarious... Sondland admits in paragraph FOUR this was based on an assumption! — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @RepMarkMeadows
Seeing many overblown (and outright false) reports about Ambassador Sondland's testimony. Here's what he actually s… https://t.co/LElBAuckCT
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Seeing many overblown (and outright false) reports about Ambassador Sondland's testimony. Here's what he actually said. 1. I did not (and still don't) know why aid was held up 2. I "PRESUMED" it was because of corruption 3. I told Yermak my assumption See paragraph 4 here: https://t.co/STZ2vtrVsv — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
The Volker/Sondland transcripts lay it out: @realDonaldTrump wanted to clean up corruption in Ukraine, and ensure taxpayer funded aid wasn’t going to corrupt causes. Only D.C. Democrats could spin protecting taxpayer money into an impeachable offense. Blatant partisanship. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
As more of these transcripts come out, Americans will begin to see that these closed-door interviews have done little to advance the Democrats’ case This unserious impeachment effort will be exposed for what it is: a charade, based on a fairytale — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @dcexaminer: “This is a different set of rules that Chairman @AdamSchiff and @SpeakerPelosi have embarked upon, but why?” -- @RepMarkM… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Yet another promise kept from this President—taking proactive steps to protect religious liberty. This won't make a lot of headlines but it's extremely important. Bravo @realDonaldTrump. — PolitiTweet.org
The Washington Times @WashTimes
Donald Trump moves to repeal Obama rule against faith-based foster-care programs https://t.co/i260Efs9jZ
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Perhaps the real reason why Democrats want to impeach @realDonaldTrump: because these are the kind of policy proposals he's up against — PolitiTweet.org
Jennifer Ablan @jennablan
Elizabeth Warren says she would not raise middle class taxes for $52 trillion health care plan @CNBC https://t.co/3hTnavPFyC
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @tperkins: Glad to visit with @realDonaldTrump to discuss how this administration is advancing conservative policies. It is clear to me… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepTedBudd: I just voted against the House resolution on the impeachment inquiry. Unfortunately, all this resolution does is put a new… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPLeader: Strong show of unity among Republicans today. 💯% voted AGAINST impeachment sham. 💪🏼 https://t.co/vNJDq9ZfOi — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @sambrodey: Coming out of the Morrison deposition, @RepMarkMeadows says “this was a great day for America and a great day for the presid… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @LouDobbs: Debunking Radical Dems. @RepMarkMeadows on former WH official, Tim Morrison’s testimony vindicating @POTUS. #MAGA #AmericaFir… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Speaker Pelosi said earlier this Congress that any impeachment effort would need to be done on a bipartisan basis. We held a vote today in the House, and it was indeed bipartisan. Impeachment received bipartisan opposition. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
One reason why the 'quid pro quo' narrative is a fairy tale: Not only were Ukraine officials unaware aid was even being delayed until a month AFTER the 7/25 phone call... the aid was released WITHOUT any new investigations. This impeachment case has no basis in reality. https://t.co/hyjSuEUURp — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
@realDonaldTrump Here they are: 2017, H. RES. 646 - 58 Dems supported 2018, H. RES. 705 - 66 Dems supported 2019, H. RES. 498 - 95 Dems supported Don't let them tell you they're reluctantly approaching this. They've always been looking for some reason—any reason—to go after this President. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Democrats keep trying to tell you they're *reluctantly* pursuing impeachment. Reminder: since @realDonaldTrump took office, they've tried to force impeachment votes THREE times. Once in 2017, '18, and earlier in '19. Reluctant? Please. Democrats are a party craving impeachment. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Washington Democrats made every effort to take down this President with a fake Russian collusion scandal It failed This Ukraine fairytale and subsequent impeachment vote is their second try This effort will fail too — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepAndyBiggsAZ: From the individuals who brought you the Russian-Collusion Hoax, Comes the sequel - the Ukrainian Hoax. Democrats wil… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Joining @BillHemmer on @AmericaNewsroom momentarily to discuss today’s empty impeachment vote from House Democrats—continuing their effort to go after @realDonaldTrump at all costs. Tune in! — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @BlazeTV: .@RepMarkMeadows is SLAMMING the Democrats for blatantly ignoring Hunter Biden’s business in Ukraine. He tells @WilkowMajorit… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
If the reports about the whistleblower’s identity are true, it raises grave, fundamental concerns about the basis of this Ukraine investigation—and explains why Washington Democrats continue making every effort to hide information from Americans — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepLeeZeldin: This impeachment resolution just introduced is fatally flawed. Just another awful misstep by House Dems running a circus,… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
House Democrats had an opportunity with their impeachment resolution to be open, transparent, and fair—or at LEAST implement some sort of order to this process—and instead they queue up a vote that preserves this hidden, disorganized mess. More of the same. This is not serious. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Please keep Jody and his family in your prayers — PolitiTweet.org
Jody Hice @JodyHice
We lost my Dad today. Tom Hice was a godly man, family man, business man, and a humble, gentle man. A giant among… https://t.co/prjzrIGtBw
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Democrats go 4+ weeks with a secretive, free for all, no rules impeachment process—and now try to save face with a short on substance resolution that only pretends to give the minority rights and blows up precedent. Americans will see right through this. What a debacle. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepSamGraves: We need to streamline and update the way we conduct disaster damage assessments to help folks recover and rebuild faster… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Follow @RepLeeZeldin who’s been in nearly all the witness depositions—doing an outstanding job highlighting the problems with the investigation, and (even more importantly) the massive flaws in House Democrats’ impeachment case against @realDonaldTrump — PolitiTweet.org
Lee Zeldin @RepLeeZeldin
Imagine how great it would be for the US if House Dems converted their blind enraged impeachment obsession into a p… https://t.co/bXzcwjnyCr
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: Since when does “effective and efficient oversight" mean asking us to be at hearings and @RepAdamSchiff's secret bunker a… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Washington Democrats’ secret impeachment interviews continue to fall flat behind closed doors, and now they’re trying to reverse course on the process to try and save face. Americans won’t buy it. I’ll be on with @seanhannity at 9:00pm to discuss. Hope you’ll tune in. — PolitiTweet.org
