Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 88 of 162.
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Seeing several pundits claiming they're "moved" by Ambassador Yovanovitch's testimony. Folks, we're not here to talk about whether you're "moved." We're here to get the facts—and they haven't changed. There has been no link shown between aid & political investigations. Period. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Once again, similar to yesterday, note how much of today's testimony centers on policy disagreements with the President. Democrats are trying to take foreign policy disagreements between career bureaucrats and the President, and spin it into evidence of an impeachable offense. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepDLesko: Headed to the impeachment hearing where former Ukraine Ambassador Yovanovitch will be testifying. Reminder: She was recalled… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
One thing to note: Notice how, so far, the Democrats have been peppering the witness with questions asking her to speculate—about the President's motives, reasons, decisions, etc. There's a reason why they're doing this. It's because the witness has no relevant information. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMattGaetz: If the Yovanovitch testimony presents as a policy disagreement, that stuff happens all the time. It’s not impeachable an… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
If we want to get in to the actual substance of her testimony, this is a direct quote: “I cannot bring any firsthand knowledge to... the July 25th phone call, the discussions surrounding the call, or any discussions surrounding the delay of security assistance.” — PolitiTweet.org
Dan Zak @MrDanZak
Chris Wallace on Fox News: "If you were not moved by the testimony of Marie Yovanovitch, you don’t have a pulse. …… https://t.co/6j245AR8O0
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @CongressmanHice: Quick reminder → Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch is yet another person who wasn’t present on the July 25th call – and tha… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @JasonMillerinDC: These are the facts... https://t.co/z30yHw1MIF — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @joelpollak: Some of the information in those missing transcripts is likely relevant to what witnesses might be asked TODAY. Democrats a… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jennybethm: Adam Schiff is not allowing for a fair process... @RepMarkMeadows is exactly right, we should hear testimony from the GOP… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Did you read the GOP witness list? Alexandra Chalupa is on it. We'd love to have her testify. Democrats blocked it. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Respectfully, this is all you need to know about Ambassador Yovanovitch's testimony. She admits she can't bring any firsthand knowledge to: - The 7/25 phone call - Discussions surrounding phone call - Discussions surrounding delay of aid And this is the Democrats second witness https://t.co/jVH2H0zcZs — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepLeeZeldin: An Ambassador can be recalled by the President at any time WITH or WITHOUT cause. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
.@Jim_Jordan made an important point earlier: Democrats still haven’t released transcripts from multiple other private interviews. And the rules Democrats passed prevent us from discussing those testimonies. Dems are holding hearings while simultaneously barring important info. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
UPDATE: we now have a SIXTH interaction, as the White House just released the first phone call between @realDonaldTrump and Zelensky on 4/21. ZERO mention of aid and political investigations there, either. Six meetings, not one mention. Wow. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @RepMarkMeadows
7/25: Trump/Zelensky phone call 7/26: Volker & Taylor meet Zelensky 8/27: Bolton meets Zelensky 9/1: VP Pence meets… https://t.co/WCqbr…
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
7/25: Trump/Zelensky phone call 7/26: Volker & Taylor meet Zelensky 8/27: Bolton meets Zelensky 9/1: VP Pence meets Zelensky 9/5: Sens. Johnson, Murphy meet Zelensky That’s five meetings. Five! And not one mention of linking aid and political investigations. This is a sham. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @SenatorBraun: Like I told Steve Bannon & @JasonMillerinDC on War Room: Impeachment today, the established political class never wanted… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Before this latest effort, House Democrats had already tried to impeach @realDonaldTrump THREE times. 2017, H.RES. 646 - with 58 Dems 2018, H.RES. 705 - with 66 Dems 2019, H.RES. 498 - with 95 Dems Don’t let Nancy Pelosi and Democrats tell you they’re doing this reluctantly. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkMeadows: They've breathlessly discussed impeachment since the day after the 2018 midterms—and some Democrats have even forced im… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Follow @RepMarkGreen who nails it here. The Democrats are now apparently relying on staffers who possibly overheard a phone call in a restaurant. Give me a break. "If this is their shock and awe, I'm yawning" https://t.co/plcLbdDixa — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkGreen: Great joining @wolfblitzer on @CNN to talk about yesterday's impeachment hearing. If this is Democrats' shock and awe, I'… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @johnddavidson: This is precisely my point in @FDRLST: The Democrats’ impeachment inquiry increasingly looks like nothing more than a di… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
One disturbing trend from these impeachment interviews - it seems much of the testimony from career bureaucrats centers around their policy disagreements with the President. If you disagree with the President on policy, go run for office. That's NOT a cause for impeachment. https://t.co/GSiSGSaQoL — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @SiriusXMPatriot: .@RepMarkMeadows gives his reaction to yesterday's #ImpeachingHearings on @BreitbartNews Daily on @SiriusXMPatriot htt… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
They've breathlessly discussed impeachment since the day after the 2018 midterms—and some Democrats have even forced impeachment votes THREE times since @realDonaldTrump's inauguration. The suggestion that they're reluctantly doing this is just completely unserious. — PolitiTweet.org
The Hill @thehill
Speaker Nancy Pelosi: "Perhaps you have not heard me when I have said this is something we do with a heavy heart. T… https://t.co/chlafzj1BF
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
This is where we're at with impeachment: Democrats think they have a new "smoking gun" because a staffer may have overheard a phone call in a restaurant. We're 11 months before an election, and that's a potential key piece of their case. Seriously. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @Scavino45: “We’ve got six people having four conversations in one sentence - and you just told me this is where you got your clear unde… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Very similarly to Mueller, it’s interesting that the Democrat victory laps mostly stopped after the uninterrupted opening statements of witnesses. There’s a reason why. It’s because when you actually scrutinize these Democrat allegations against @realDonaldTrump—they fall apart. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepAndyBiggsAZ: The Democrats' sham hearing is over. 1. Contents of the transcript were not disputed. 2. No evidence emerged to show… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @SteveScalise: Direct quote from the Dems' public show hearing: "Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct." In what universe is… — PolitiTweet.org
