Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 87 of 162.
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @kilmeade: .@foxandfriends: Republican @RepMarkMeadows speaks out on what Republicans hope to accomplish in week two of the public impea… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
MORNING CONSULT: "First Public Hearings Fail to Increase Support for Impeachment Inquiry" "Net voter support for impeachment inquiry hits a new low" https://t.co/PouBnOyg2i — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: Welcome back to another day of @RepAdamSchiff's #impeachment circus. Democrats can call it whatever they want. The Amer… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
In one breath the Democrats insist this impeachment isn’t political—and in another, they decide what to allege based on polling — PolitiTweet.org
Rachael Bade @rachaelmbade
NUGGET: The Dem decision 2 retire “quid pro quo” & embrace “bribery” followed a DCCC study showing the word resona… https://t.co/hNREU…
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Why Democrats don’t have a case: - The aid freeze was always temporary. It got released. - Ukraine wasn’t aware of the freeze during the 7/25 call - there was no leverage being exercised - In SIX interactions, not one mention of a link between aid & political investigations — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkGreen: No evidence presented in last week's hearings amounted to an impeachable offense. Bottom line, @RepAdamSchiff's star witn… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @LouDobbs: Dems’ Disaster. @RepScottPerry says Yovanovitch’s testimony was a waste of time. #AmericaFirst #MAGA #Dobbs https://t.co/haWK… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @Jim_Jordan: .@SpeakerPelosi called the President of the United States an "imposter." What an insult to the 63 million Americans who vo… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Flailing. The public isn’t buying their efforts to take down the President—and they know it. — PolitiTweet.org
CNN Politics @CNNPolitics
BREAKING: The House is now investigating whether President Trump lied to special counselor Robert Mueller… https://t.co/sgYjpomrVs
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepAndyBiggsAZ: Ukraine phone call hoax is going so horribly for Democrats that they are now circling back on their previously debunked… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Not being discussed enough: House Democrats are holding public impeachment hearings when critical depositions haven’t been released—some that include key exculpatory information for the President. Perhaps it’s because they’re not interested in you seeing the full set of facts. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepLeeZeldin: NO public hearing should take place until ALL outstanding depo transcripts are released. Mark Sandy's answer re the reaso… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
The people who had real access to and conversations with @realDonaldTrump have consistently made it clear: there was zero tie between aid to Ukraine and political investigations. Period. This impeachment charade will fall apart. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
In the closed-door deposition Saturday, we once again heard a consistent theme damaging to the Democrats’ impeachment effort: 1) the suspension of aid to Ukraine was always temporary, and 2) it was not for any political consideration. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepLeeZeldin: With a great American, @RepMarkMeadows, after the latest impeachment circus depo today back in Schiff’s Capitol basement… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @MZHemingway: If Democrats push an article of impeachment for literally tweeting, about his Constitutional powers no less, I don’t think… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
For Washington Democrats and pundits who are incredulous that @realDonaldTrump recalled an ambassador, certain that it must be evidence of a conspiracy... President Obama fired every Bush appointed ambassador upon his election. https://t.co/quP7oMAaBA — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkMeadows: The Democrats second day impeachment witness, Ambassador Yovanovitch, has no information on any of the relevant questio… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @guypbenson: And those who know @EliseStefanik aren’t the least bit surprised https://t.co/dD0RHm4qD0 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @MarkBednar: WATCH: .@Jim_Jordan calls out Chairman Schiff keeping transcripts hidden from the American people. https://t.co/5pZlvXNAwK — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Great work from @EliseStefanik here, addressing how Chairman Schiff reversed course on having the whistleblower testify. Remember: the whistleblower answering questions interestingly became "not relevant," after it was revealed Schiff staff had communicated with them. https://t.co/IeKqQGb6AX — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Once again, great job from my colleagues. The hearing today was basically an exercise in total speculation—Ambassador Yovanovitch provided no relevant information, because she had none. The charade rolls along. But the needle didn't move. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jennybethm: Instead of being "moved" by Ambassador Yavanovitch's testimony, the pundits could be focusing on the fact that she has no f… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
The Democrats second day impeachment witness, Ambassador Yovanovitch, has no information on any of the relevant questions. They have no case. This is not serious. https://t.co/dHTtLAnoI5 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @CBSNews: Stewart: Do you have any information regarding the president of the United States accepting any bribes? Yovanovitch: No. Ste… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Bravo from @RepChrisStewart, who just summarized this whole hearing: Q: "Do you have any information regarding POTUS accepting bribes?" Yovanovitch: "No" Q: Do you have any evidence of any criminal activity from POTUS?" Yovanovitch: "No" That, there, should be the ballgame — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Not a single one of these facts have changed today: - Both call transcripts show zero link between aid and political investigations - Aid was released WITHOUT any new investigations - Ukraine didn’t know aid was withheld during 7/25 call - Trump/Zelensky both say: zero pressure — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkMeadows: Respectfully, this is all you need to know about Ambassador Yovanovitch's testimony. She admits she can't bring any fir… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Democrats are now making a roundabout issue of the President's right to recall his own ambassadors. My goodness. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Schiff just asked Ambassador Yovanovitch a blatantly speculative question on the President's mindset, regarding a phone call she wasn't a party to and alleged discussions she had no knowledge of. This is all they have—speculation. They have no case. — PolitiTweet.org
