Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 84 of 162.
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @ChuckRossDC: Fiona Hill is testifying right now about something she heard in passing about Kash Patel. She mentioned that in her deposi… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
A notable theme in these hearings: some career officials seem to act as though their job is to decide America’s foreign policy It’s the President who sets policy—not unelected bureaucrats. POTUS believes every dollar we send abroad should be questioned. And most Americans agree. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
There are headlines all over the place today that Gordon Sondland affirmed a 'quid pro quo' yesterday. That was his opening statement. They must have missed the questioning part, where Sondland admitted: he had no evidence. It was an assumption. Blatantly misleading. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @seanhannity: #HANNITY’S LINEUP OF GREAT GUESTS: @RepMikeTurner, @RepBradWenstrup, @JSolomonReports, @RepMarkMeadows, @LindseyGrahamSC,… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
So we’re clear: this statement melted under questioning. He had no evidence. Admitted it was all an assumption. Interesting to tweet this out without that context. — PolitiTweet.org
The Hill @thehill
Gordon Sondland: "Was there a quid pro quo? As I testified previously, with regard to the requested White House cal… https://t.co/geUMFgDUkW
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepJeffDuncan: This is huge. @RepMikeTurner: "Nobody else on this planet told you that Donald Trump was tying aid to these investigatio… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RaheemKassam: .@RepMarkMeadows Unloads on Amb. Sondland Testimony: Contradictory, Opinion-Based, Second Hand https://t.co/aywnb4QfiS — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkMeadows: Wow. @RepMikeTurner: "Mr. Sondland, let's be clear: no one on this planet—not Donald Trump, Rudy Guiliani, Mick Mulvan… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepBrianBabin: .@RepAdamSchiff, I believe this is what you call a “checkmate." After hearing this, Ambassador Sondland shouldn't have a… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @PatriotNotPol: Can we pass #USMCA now? Maybe do a budget? Is securing the border too much to ask? Closing asylum loopholes? https://… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @elwasson: Too Trump defender @RepMarkMeadows says the Dem case for impeachment is crumbling and there is no direct evidence Trump links… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: - Not aware of any connection between a pause in aid and an investigation. - Not aware of Secretary Pompeo having any di… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Respectfully... at least 3 of the 5 “takeaways” listed in this article explicitly collapsed under questioning - when Gordon Sondland admitted no one had ever told him of a quid pro quo, and it was all based on his “presumption” — PolitiTweet.org
CNN @CNN
US Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland changed the course of the House impeachment inquiry into Presid… https://t.co/Y2SStI0H6y
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Interesting to see how the “bombshell” highlights running from Sondland’s testimony are basically all from his opening statement, which largely collapsed under questioning. It got exposed as almost entirely speculative. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepTedBudd: Ambassador Sondland admitted that he had no testimony that tied President @realDonaldTrump to a quid pro quo. In fact, th… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @HolmesJosh: If you step back and review the totality of this testimony, the first hand testimony from Sondland is almost entirely exone… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @Jim_Jordan: President Trump: “I want NOTHING. I want no quid pro quo. I want Zelensky to do what he ran on.” https://t.co/x9Y3cbz8Kw — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Chairman Schiff just said the testimony and evidence Gordon Sondland brought today was "deeply troubling." Your reminder of what that testimony was... in Gordon Sondland's own words: [Nothing] "...other than my own presumption." https://t.co/9yyaa9X4BP — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkMeadows: Wow. @RepMikeTurner: "Mr. Sondland, let's be clear: no one on this planet—not Donald Trump, Rudy Guiliani, Mick Mulvan… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
🚨🚨WATCH: This from @RepMikeTurner is the moment of today's hearing. Spread it far and wide. Question: You have ZERO testimony that @realDonaldTrump tied aid to any quid pro quo scheme Sondland: "Yes... other than my presumption." Ballgame. This, here, is the real bombshell. https://t.co/rdqmJ9eka9 — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @ForAmerica: Rep. Brad Wenstrup: "Two plus two does equal four. But in reality, two presumptions plus two presumptions does not equal on… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
“You keep saying 2 + 2 = 4. But two presumptions does not equal one fact.” - @RepBradWenstrup He's absolutely right. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Wow. @RepMikeTurner: "Mr. Sondland, let's be clear: no one on this planet—not Donald Trump, Rudy Guiliani, Mick Mulvaney, Mike Pompeo—no one told you aid was tied to political investigations, is that correct." Gordon Sondland: "That's correct." Game over. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
This is what House Democrats' impeachment will be defined by. Multiple levels of hearsay, a shortage of facts, and one common theme: zero evidence @realDonaldTrump did anything wrong. https://t.co/LyUS4NciNO — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @GOPoversight: https://t.co/vBylLDhJci — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMattGaetz: "No one told me directly that the aid was tied to anything. I was presuming it was." #impeachmenthearing https://t.co/ccp… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepRickCrawford: He also remembers what the President told him directly - that he wanted no quid-pro-quo and for Zelensky to do the rig… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jennybethm: Sondland could not be clearer, @realDonaldTrump was not involved in quid pro quo. Today in impeachment sham another witness… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
The tweet was quite obviously referring to Sondland never hearing a quid pro quo order from the President, but if you want to talk about conversations, sure. Did you hear the one Sondland just testified about? President Trump: “I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo.” — PolitiTweet.org
Susan Hennessey @Susan_Hennessey
Is there a different hearing going on right now? Because Gordon Sondland is testifying to conversations he had pers… https://t.co/ewslhqA0aG
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @BrentBozell: Kills the whole premise of these hearings. https://t.co/L3FwIDK1vr — PolitiTweet.org
