Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 80 of 162.
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Think about this: Washington Democrats are impeaching the President, with 24/7 news coverage, blocking a new pro-worker trade deal, and more— —and the American economy under this President is still setting records. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Wow. Non-stop impeachment barrage. And America’s economy and @realDonaldTrump keep delivering big time wins anyway. — PolitiTweet.org
CNBC @CNBC
Job growth soared in November. 266,000 jobs were added last month, beating the 187,000 jobs expected. Unemployment… https://t.co/bxTkvXVofn
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Doubt it’s a coincidence Democrats rushing to hold their next impeachment hearing Monday at 9:00am. Same day the IG report on FISA abuse expected to drop... — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
If my Democrat colleagues are looking for truly undisputed facts: - Call transcript shows zero link between aid/political investigations - Aid was released with no new investigations - Ukraine didn’t know aid was withheld during the call - Trump/Zelensky both say: zero pressure — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepJeffDuncan: This has always been a verdict looking for a crime. It’s been Democrats’ plan since January 2017 when @realDonaldTrump e… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Amidst all the impeachment noise... a new Economist/YouGov poll out yesterday asked registered voters: “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” Yes - 50% No - 32% Non-stop political barrage. @realDonaldTrump delivering anyway. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Jonathan Turley is a legal scholar who does not support Trump (didn't vote for him). The only unbiased analyst on the witness panel yesterday told us that precisely what Democrats are doing represents an abuse of power. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Speaker Pelosi this morning: “The president’s actions in taking these things to court... is an obstruction of justice.” Jonathan Turley to Democrats, YESTERDAY: "If you impeach a President ... out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It's YOUR abuse of power." https://t.co/IMLhaN7Qub — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Speaker Pelosi tacitly admitted 2 things here: 1) Asked about key moments of the impeachment "investigation," she brings up polling 2) When asked RE: the speed of impeachment, she says "Mueller was appointed 2.5 years ago" This is all about politics, and has been since 2017 https://t.co/jsTrV1Pjaj — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
In a city built on bad talking points, Democrats' suggestion that they're heartbroken and "reluctantly" impeaching @realDonaldTrump may be the worst one of all. They've been looking for some reason—any reason—to impeach the President since January 20, 2017. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @RepMarkMeadows
Since they’re doing it again... don’t let Democrats pretend like they’re agonizing over impeachment. Give me a brea… https://t.co/578A8xkscK
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Since they’re doing it again... don’t let Democrats pretend like they’re agonizing over impeachment. Give me a break. They had already tried to impeach the President THREE times before this year. And they voted to pursue impeachment before they even saw the Ukraine call text! — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @Jim_Jordan: One set of rules for them. A different set for us. https://t.co/dzYPrJ5rRa — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Pelosi and Democrats keep repeating this talking point that “the facts are uncontested.” I’m not sure what hearings they were watching—because none of their witnesses brought any facts. Just presumptions. Perhaps they didn’t watch the hearings... along with the rest of America. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkMeadows: Invoking the name of the President's 13 year old son to make a joke. Reprehensible. https://t.co/cLuW31NQRT — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
What we got today: 3 witnesses, with long records of liberal bias, one of whom made a joke about a 13 year old kid and disparaged conservatives living in rural areas. And then one witness, who opposes Trump, still saying the record does not support impeachment. You tell me. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jasoninthehouse: Turley nails it!! https://t.co/1gFj1By0ty — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @FLOTUS: A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Invoking the name of the President's 13 year old son to make a joke. Reprehensible. https://t.co/cLuW31NQRT — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @jason_howerton: .@RepMattGaetz to Prof. Karlan: "You don't get to interrupt me on this time! ... When you invoke the president son's n… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
I remain lost as to what my Democrat colleagues thought they were accomplishing bringing in 3 liberal law professors to explain why President Trump should be impeached. This is a debacle. — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @MZHemingway: One of Democrats' impeachment witnesses, the one who says she can't walk on the sidewalk in front of Trump hotel because o… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @DougHeye: I know Democrats are all "speaking truth to power" re Karlan, but bringing up the president's son is tasteless and deserves n… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepMarkGreen: The Democrats are attacking freedom. They want to stack the Supreme Court, do away with the Electoral College, and let NY… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @RepAndyBiggsAZ: Today’s hearing was supposed to shore up and reenergize the Democrats’ sinking base of support for impeachment. It is… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
RT @PressSec: Classless move by a Democratic “witness”. Prof Karlan uses a teenage boy who has nothing to do with this joke of a hearing (a… — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Democrats: "Vindman said the 7/25 call was a demand" Tim Morrison: "It wasn't a demand" Kurt Volker: "It wasn't a demand" President Zelensky: "I was not pressured" Democrats: "...Vindman said it was a demand" — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @RepMarkMeadows
To be clear what's going on here: Democrats are using Alexander Vindman's *interpretation* of the President Zelensk… https://t.co/59pUeCcp7s
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
To be clear what's going on here: Democrats are using Alexander Vindman's *interpretation* of the President Zelensky call, elevating Vindman's opinion even though Vindman's superior (Morrison), an ambassador to Ukraine (Volker), and ... President Zelensky ... all say he's wrong — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
This is a very serious, solemn, and prayerful process — PolitiTweet.org
Kathryn Watson @kathrynw5
Oh my. Karlan: While the president can name his son Barron, he can't make himself baron
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Again, if you were inclined to believe the Democrats' witnesses are giving unbiased analysis... Here is Pamela Karlan, law professor Democrats invited to urge impeachment, explaining how she once decided to cross the street rather than walk by Trump Hotel https://t.co/xWVqhhPtQx — PolitiTweet.org
Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows
Another headline quote from Jonathan Turley—again, someone who does not support POTUS: "The record does not establish obstruction in this case... if you accept all of their presumptions, it would be obstruction. But impeachments have to be based on proof, NOT presumptions” https://t.co/5AzWMVWDSy — PolitiTweet.org
