Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 75 of 162.

Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Today will be remembered as the day your House Democrat majority voted to impeach President @realDonaldTrump for a crime they couldn’t find and a case they couldn’t prove. You won’t forget. And neither will we. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 19, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Andriy Yermak, the man Adam Schiff just cited in his closing argument, DAYS ago gave an interview where he totally dismantled the Democrats' case—saying there was no political quid pro quo, and Ukraine never thought or believed there was A fitting end to this disastrous charade — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 19, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @RepJeffDuncan: Swalwell on CNN: 'We can only conclude that you're guilty.’ With his argument: I guess Obama, Holder & Clinton were all… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 19, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

I remind my Democrat colleagues as they repeat the phrase “no one is above the law,” that the President certainly isn’t below the law, either They have treated @realDonaldTrump as if he is, throughout this entire process And the American people have noticed — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 19, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Long after this impeachment charade is over, it will be said of Washington Democrats: When they couldn’t bring themselves to support President Trump for the success of the country... They consoled themselves by trying to silence the will of those who did—the American voters https://t.co/MxdUhHG8OA — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 19, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @KFaulders: @RepMarkMeadows .@RepMarkMeadows: "[The Democrats] said what we need to do for impeachment is to have compelling evidence an… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @GarrettHaake: He's right about this. Sondland's memory problems make him a less-than-ideal witness. He wasn't a note-taker or even part… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Adam Schiff says GOP “won’t address the facts.” I’m curious. What facts? Amb Sondland’s assumption? Bill Taylor having never met POTUS? The call which mentioned no political link? The 5 meetings where a political link was NEVER mentioned? Give me a break. They have no facts. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @ChuckRossDC: "Some process issues"? FBI agents failed to disclose Page's relationship w/ CIA, that Steele told FBI his main sub-sourc… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

(And the subsequent FISA's were somehow even worse, yes) — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

"Process issues" Withholding exculpatory evidence, failing to disclose key details about Carter Page's background, hiding problems with Chris Steele's sources, and using an uncorroborated Steele dossier is not "process issues." It is deep, fundamental abuse of a system. — PolitiTweet.org

Susan Hennessey @Susan_Hennessey

Horowitz's comments reinforce a key takeaway that is insufficiently clear from report. The initial FISA application… https://t.co/vxgnyqVCmn

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

The only firsthand witnesses Congress heard from all say the same thing: this is FALSE — PolitiTweet.org

CBS Evening News @CBSEveningNews

Pres. Trump "was willing to sacrifice our national security by withholding support for a critical strategic partner… https://t.co/O2RHiUY0af

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Morrison, Volker, Zelensky, Yermak, Trump. All firsthand witnesses. All say the same thing: there was no political quid pro quo, there was no bribery, there was no pressure, and NO discussions of such. Doesn’t matter what the Democrats say. Their case is malarkey. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

This exchange with Senator @HawleyMO should raise some eyebrows. Remember the Democrat talking point that political bias didn't affect the investigation, or Crossfire Hurricane? More misleading. IG Horowitz: "We did NOT reach that conclusion" https://t.co/Yj8L8axpMl — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

In case you missed it because of the impeachment charade in the House, based on made up crimes... IG Michael Horowitz is over in the Senate again today, discussing his extensive, documented trail of evidence proving rampant FBI FISA abuse against the Trump campaign — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @realDailyWire: 🎥 @MarkMeadows: Once again, the Democrats will be disconnected from what the American people actually want. https://t.… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @SteveGuest: .@MarkMeadows: “the Democrats will be disconnected from what the American people actually want” https://t.co/rIReTKB6qY — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @RepJeffDuncan: Even Speaker Pelosi admits this impeachment effort has been going on for 2.5 years – long before any phone call between… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

The suggestion that Democrats are sad or reluctant about impeaching the President is a joke. If they wanted an out, they had plenty. The evidence was pitiful. They had zero bipartisan support. They didn’t take an out because they never wanted one. They’re desperate to impeach. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @realDonaldTrump: “This is all about convicting a President based on innuendo, not on the facts. Even the Ukrainian President said there… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Think about this: at the beginning of this process, Pelosi, Schiff, and Nadler told us impeachment would need compelling evidence and bipartisan support. Here we are today... and we have neither of those. Weak, secondhand evidence—and bipartisan OPPOSITION. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 18, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @Jim_Jordan: The media attacks Republican senators for defending the President. But nearly all of the Dem senators running for Presiden… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

This letter can be taken seriously right after we see the "compelling evidence of collusion," and the evidence that the FISA process was followed properly, as the 2018 Schiff memo contended — PolitiTweet.org

The Washington Post @washingtonpost

Schiff says Pence’s office may have purposefully misled panel about contents of his Zelensky call https://t.co/ygfDPl4R2k

Posted Dec. 17, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @ChuckRossDC: Flashback: @RepMarkMeadows asked FISC Judge Rosemary Collyer in Oct. 2018 to review accuracy of FBI's FISA applications. (… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Remember: the same day Democrats introduced impeachment articles, Andriy Yermak—President Zelensky's top aide and the only Ukraine official *thought* to know of alleged aid/political link—said it was all false He corroborated Volker and Morrison and undercut the Democrats' case — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Amazing. Great job Mark. God bless you Sgt. Corley! — PolitiTweet.org

News Radio 570 WWNC @newsradio570

Our morning show guy, @Starling570wwnc has been working on a project and needs your help. A short encouraging email… https://t.co/52DsFT1Q5t

Posted Dec. 17, 2019
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @CongressmanHice: Four public polls released yesterday show support sinking for this sham impeachment. Why? Because @realDonaldTrump… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @JennaEllisEsq: Exactly. I made this same point on @foxnewsnight yesterday. https://t.co/f4XxLGPBwb — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @jasoninthehouse: Exactly right ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.co/sxMJFJGAz6 — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2019 Retweet
Profile Image

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

6/20/18 Fox News headline: "FBI may have modified witness reports, misled DOJ watchdog with 'false information,' GOP Rep says" Thanks to the IG report... we now know they did https://t.co/I2AkzEWMys — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Dec. 17, 2019