Mark Meadows

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Justice will be done. President Trump will be ACQUITTED. — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

You can sense Democrats feeling their impeachment dreams slipping away. Now flailing a bit. Resorting to more misleading, more misdirection and again making up Trump narrations. One way or the other, this is going to end soon. And they know it. — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Both Chuck Schumer and Joe Biden opposed adding additional witnesses in 1999 during the Senate’s Clinton impeachment trial — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @IngrahamAngle: Tune in to see the Dems’ final impeachment gasps. ⁦@RepMarkMeadows⁩ ⁦@newtgingrich⁩ ⁦@VDHanson⁩ ⁦@TomBevanRCP⁩ — and the… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @burgessev: New w @BresPolitico: As senator in 1999, Joe Biden wrote four-page memo arguing against need for Senate to bring in witnesse… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Wow. Joe Biden argued against the Senate calling witnesses in 1999 impeachment memo. @politico https://t.co/RtqVnVAgJX — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Schiff denied Republicans witnesses when he ran this process and now all of a sudden he demands the Senate call MORE witness that he wants, but didn’t have the will to pursue on his own—just so he can try and salvage his doomed case The hypocrisy is breathtaking — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

House Democrats trying to make the point that the word “corruption” never appears in the July 25th phone call. You… https://t.co/q8wYVDAUpY — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

And then they’ll want another week. And another week. Then another. And then you’ll look up and it’ll be Election Day. #GiveMeABreak — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

FACT-CHECKERS: There's something right here for you. Democrats have repeated this false claim multiple times throug… https://t.co/gjcRiRPFA8 — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @RepLeeZeldin: FACT CHECK: “FOUR Adam Schiffs” CLAIM: Jason Crow just said that none of the 17 witnesses testified as to why there was… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Jay Sekulow just addressed this brilliantly. "Democrats may not like that we've been able to respond to their 17 w… https://t.co/p1Mfx5MEP7 — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Adam Schiff didn't answer the question from Senator Graham and others just now. Here's the answer: There is FAR more evidence for opening a case against the Bidens involvement in Ukrainian corruption than there EVER was for investigating the Trump campaign in 2016 — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Trump speaking to Ukraine right after Mueller's "no collusion" verdict is NOT evidence of more collusion like Schif… https://t.co/Ol46ROlBgc — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

The "no witnesses" claims from the Democrats need to be fact-checked. It's totally false. They've had 17 witnesses… https://t.co/dBC4yekLeF — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Blown away that Schiff and the Democrats now want to talk about "fairness." President Trump was allowed no legal representation for the first 71 days of a 78 day House investigation. That's 91%. "Fairness" wasn't in the Democrats' vocabulary when they controlled this process. — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

“Ask John Bolton" -Adam Schiff WATCH for yourself: John Bolton, 8/28/19, describing President Trump's two calls wi… https://t.co/WHki5hDUdx — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @realDonaldTrump: Happy birthday today to two of the very best in Congress—@RepMikeJohnson (age 48) and @RepLeeZeldin (age 40—big one!).… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Adam Schiff and Democrats inventing narratives again! Nowhere is there any evidence of President Trump ever saying… https://t.co/ybGEb9KBgr — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @RepLeeZeldin: FACT CHECK: This line earns “FOUR Adam Schiffs” The President never said this. I wonder if there has ever been a prosecu… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Democrats were just asked if they had evidence administration officials were involved in a quid pro quo scheme. The… https://t.co/2dWdOzwwH5 — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

How about this: If the Senate discusses calling witnesses, and Adam Schiff continues demanding we block questions and testimony on the whistleblower... then Adam Schiff should testify — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

128 days. 17 Democrat witnesses. And they still have no case. It’s over. This trial should end tomorrow with President Trump ACQUITTED. — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @RepTedBudd: As a country, we can’t keep spending more than we take in. The math doesn’t add up. That’s why today I joined my colleague… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @RepLeeZeldin: Schiff has proven that there was an Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Congress. The problem for him though is that he and… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @EliseStefanik: There is one transcript that Adam Schiff refuses to release. The Intelligence Community Inspector General transcript.… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Every day it becomes more clear what outstanding choices President Trump made for his legal team. They've been tremendous laying out the facts and articulating the law. Great day for the President. Great day for the country. — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

If Adam Schiff wants to talk about historic elements of this impeachment... How about the idea this is the first i… https://t.co/xUfzOMXbUg — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

RT @SenThomTillis: The only thing we’ve seen from the #impeachment trial is a political exercise by Chuck and Nancy to prevent us from cont… — PolitiTweet.org

Mark Meadows @MarkMeadows

Quick reminder: right now the witness count is 17-0—17 witnesses, all compelled by Schiff and Democrats—and Democra… https://t.co/FBbxtxgwsR — PolitiTweet.org