Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 712 of 1599.
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
The Constitution is our guide which we must never abandon. Listen to my fuller argument on the constitutionality of Florida's action below. https://t.co/y2jCByvgdl w/@newsmax, @jennpellegrino https://t.co/ZrfS2nbvlG — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
The Constitution is our guide which we must never abandon. Listen to my fuller argument on the constitutionality of Florida's action below. https://t.co/y2jCByvgdl https://t.co/qtSSVocpCa — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@DbackFan918 @RAVerBruggen @njhochman DeSantis and FL legislators have admitted it was retaliation. Sorry, but their statements speak for themselves. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@BadLegalTakes Yessssssss — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
RT @BadLegalTakes: https://t.co/M4umCcp0DD — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@HeavyMegtal Thinking the Supreme Court quotation is a reputable source. 🤷🏼♀️ — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@njhochman @RAVerBruggen The benefit doesn’t have to be universally accessible for the government to be barred from revoking it to punish protected speech. The benefit in this case is the special district. Florida has admitted they sunsetted the district (the adverse action) in retaliation. It’s illegal. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@scottmcnealy “They do already.” So that makes it okay? The principle here is that whatever the Democrats do illegally Republicans can and should do too? — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@KurtSchlichter This is the legal issue. As a lawyer, Kurt, you should understand the problem here. https://t.co/2aJFqksxEe — PolitiTweet.org
Robert VerBruggen @RAVerBruggen
@njhochman @JennaEllisEsq It's unconstitutional for the government to punish protected speech. The fact that the sa… https://t.co/CGAo1ijSbh
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
Hannity Hits New High! https://t.co/O6mE3jM6UE — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@RAVerBruggen @njhochman Finally, someone who gets the issue and the problem. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
THIS. — PolitiTweet.org
Robert VerBruggen @RAVerBruggen
@njhochman @JennaEllisEsq It's unconstitutional for the government to punish protected speech. The fact that the sa… https://t.co/CGAo1ijSbh
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@njhochman How hard is it to understand that a government cannot use its power to retaliate against a corporation or individual because the government doesn’t like their speech? 1A protects free speech for all. Florida has admitted they acted in retaliation against Disney for “being woke.” — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@njhochman Yes, what Florida is doing by retaliating against Disney is illegal and unconstitutional. A government cannot retaliate against a corporation or individual for exercising free speech. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@realJacobAirey No, not at all what I’m doing. I’m saying speaking for or against any legislation is protected speech. Government cannot retaliate against anyone for exercising protected speech. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
Retaliatory adverse action does not have to come in the form of drafting Goofy or raising capital gains tax to be illegal. It can come in the form of sunsetting a special district. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Hochman @njhochman
As @RyanLEllis wrote yesterday, "what we’re talking about in the Disney case is taking away a corporate-welfare, cr… https://t.co/ibaN7o4kfx
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
Retaliatory adverse action by the government for exercising constitutionally protected speech. That’s the issue. — PolitiTweet.org
Nate Hochman @njhochman
Disney's "protected speech" is still protected, it's just in the absence of special tax breaks. Florida's governmen… https://t.co/4ffDfu0sKO
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
Would you also agree that every blue state should go after conservative leaning companies? — PolitiTweet.org
Mister Groyper @MisterGroyper
@JennaEllisEsq Good. Every red state should go after democrat leaning companies.
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@mcdowellformo @Newsweek @GovRonDeSantis @Disney You also bypassed my question. Would you support a blue state retaliating against a conservative company for exercising free speech? — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@mcdowellformo @Newsweek @GovRonDeSantis @Disney Your response makes utterly zero sense. The special district is not unconstitutional, but it isn’t the issue. Disney has a constitutionally protected right to speak against the FL parental rights bill. FL cannot retaliate against Disney by removing the district. It’s not hard. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
Removal of the special district *is* the penalty. Retaliatory adverse action doesn’t have to come in the form of fines. — PolitiTweet.org
Max here to service you. @nogymallowed
@JennaEllisEsq Is Florida fining or penalizing Disney? Or is it just reimposing the normal tax burdens like every other company pays?
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@Mgilliam “It’s the fact they stated” … yeah, that’s called free speech. It’s not that complicated. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@Country35742918 @realJacobAirey The FL government and DeSantis admitted it’s retaliation. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
The special status isn’t the legal issue here. Illegal government retaliation for exercising free speech is. Whether or not Disney “should” have a special status, they do, and the FL government cannot revoke it in retaliation for Disney’s view on the Parental Rights in Ed bill. — PolitiTweet.org
skylarlynn @skylarl00870178
@JennaEllisEsq @realJacobAirey @KurtSchlichter You can’t dismiss the special status.
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@thepeng40407186 @realJacobAirey @KurtSchlichter The FL government is quite literally retaliating against them for speaking. Censorship isn’t the issue here—retaliation is. — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
And you’re okay with this? The corporations shouldn’t be able to sue the overreaching government like Masterpiece Cakeshop and win 7-2 at SCOTUS? — PolitiTweet.org
BombasticallyMe @Indytruther1
Blue states have used the power of the government to retaliate against businesses and corporations what reality do… https://t.co/90LNHuV5V3
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@realJacobAirey Ah you fell for it. You’d fail your law school exam. The point is that the speech is protected under the Constitution. We aren’t arguing the merits of the bill itself, just the right to speak. Similarly, we aren’t arguing the merit of Disney’s special status, but govt retaliation — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
@realJacobAirey @KurtSchlichter Ah you fell for it. You’d fail your law school exam. The point is that the speech is protected under the Constitution. We aren’t arguing the merits of the bill itself, just the right to speak. Similarly, we aren’t arguing the merit of Disney’s special status, but govt retaliation — PolitiTweet.org
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
.@KurtSchlichter, if a Blue state used power of government to retaliate against a conservative corporation for exercising constitutionally protected speech by making a public statement against an abortion bill, would you agree with the Blue state doing this? — PolitiTweet.org
Kurt Schlichter @KurtSchlichter
This is a terrible analogy. It’s just not right at all. I strongly support destroying our enemies in order to make… https://t.co/Z3aYHOPBbe
Jenna Ellis 🇺🇸 @JennaEllisEsq
Hey @glennbeck, you & @BillOReilly discussed FL v. Disney today, but totally missed the legal point: It’s illegal for a government (red or blue) take adverse action against a corporation or individual in retribution for constitutionally protected speech. Disney will sue and win. — PolitiTweet.org
