Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 464 of 1010.
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @SenJeffMerkley: Our Senate constitutional responsibility to hold a trial is—inherently—the responsibility to hold a FAIR trial. And t… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @ChrisCoons: THREAD: Late last night – I asked the President’s lawyers a pretty simple question: Does President Trump agree that foreign… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
We are a nation that was founded on the ideas of: Truth, reasoned debate, facts, ideas, and argument. That’s w… https://t.co/X7eOU4JOdc — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @SenTinaSmith: Last night was breathtaking. The President’s defenders have completed the transition from saying the President DID nothin… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @SenBrianSchatz: A fair trial means having witnesses and documents. There's no excuse for us not to hear from John Bolton and anyone els… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @ChrisCoons: The President’s counsel didn’t answer my question or stand by the position in his brief. It should be easy: foreign inter… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Q from @SenatorSinema: In other instances, receiving countries knew funds were being withheld to change behavior & further American policy. Why—when the admin withheld Ukrainian security assistance—didn't it notify Congress, or make Ukraine or partner countries publicly aware? https://t.co/B1i79vN14q — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from Sen. Murphy to Pres. Trump's lawyers: The House Managers have committed to abide by rulings by the Chief Justice on witness testimony and admissibility of evidence. Will the president’s counsel make the same commitment, obviating any concerns of an extended trial? https://t.co/zZ1oJOoq2d — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @GillibrandNY, @SenBobCasey, Sen. Murphy, & @SenJackyRosen to House Managers: How do the President's actions differ from other holds on foreign assistance? How is the hold and release of congressionally appropriated assistance to foreign countries supposed to work? https://t.co/3zHyexw00V — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @SenSchumer: Very telling moment: Pres. Trump’s lawyers claimed they don't want absolute immunity But when I asked them to name one wi… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @MarkWarner: The President and his lawyers are just wrong. Foreign election interference is a threat to national security like every sin… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
From @SenBlumenthal, @MarkWarner, @MartinHeinrich, @SenKamalaHarris: On the kinds of propaganda disseminated by Russia in 2016 on social media: Isn’t it one of the highest priorities of our intelligence community to do everything possible to prevent such foreign interference? https://t.co/QsVuM4jpsc — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @SenJackyRosen: I’m taking my constitutional duty in this trial seriously. Today, I joined several colleagues in asking the House Mana… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenGaryPeters to the House Managers: Does an impeachable abuse of power require that a president's corrupt plan actually succeed? https://t.co/KodDnhXrwK — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from Senator @ChrisCoons to President Trump’s lawyers: Does President Trump agree with your statement that foreigners’ involvement in American elections is illegal? #SenateQuestions https://t.co/cqgSqUSqA9 — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from Senator Klobuchar to the House Managers: What possible reason could there be for allowing 26 witnesses—17 of whom had not previously testified in the House—in a judicial impeachment trial and hearing none for a president’s trial? https://t.co/P564eAVDSI — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenAngusKing to House Managers: Mr. Giuliani was in Ukraine exclusively on a political errand—by his own admission—so doesn’t the president’s mention of Giuliani by name in the July 25th call conclusively establish the real purpose of the call? #SenateQuestions https://t.co/4qdPc16xmP — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenWhitehouse to President Trump's lawyers: Could you please give an accurate and truthful answer to the question: Did the president ever mention the Bidens in connection with corruption in Ukraine before Vice President Biden announced his candidacy in April 2019? https://t.co/t8d3uZVEey — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenCortezMasto to House Managers: Can you describe the due process President Trump received during House proceedings compared to previous presidents? Did President Trump take advantage of any opportunities to have his counsel participate? #SenateQuestions https://t.co/eSrirJDXqA — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenatorDurbin to House Managers: If President Trump were to actually invoke executive privilege in this proceeding, wouldn’t he be required to identify the specific documents or communications containing sensitive material that he seeks to protect? https://t.co/OvgmWrfqDC — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
RT @SenSchumer: I asked the House Managers if they’d please respond to the answer that was just given by President Trump’s lawyers. Becaus… — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenTinaSmith to the House Managers: If the president’s actions are so perfect, why wouldn’t he allow fact witnesses to testify under oath about what he has said publicly? https://t.co/LPz6QhjAFp — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from Senator Warren: If Pres. Zelensky called Pres. Trump and offered dirt on Pres. Trump’s political rivals in exchange for Pres. Trump handing over hundreds of millions in military aid, that would clearly be bribery. Why would the reverse be more acceptable? https://t.co/nQfVo3BVsm — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Senator Warren to House Managers: If Pres. Zelensky called Pres. Trump and offered dirt on Pres. Trump’s political rivals in exchange for Pres. Trump handing over hundreds of millions in military aid, that would clearly be bribery. Why would the reverse be more acceptable? https://t.co/MTZV1vdIwC — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from Senator Sanders to the House Managers: Given the media has documented President Trump’s thousands and thousands of lies while in office—more than 16,200 as of January 20—why would we be expected to believe that anything President Trump says has credibility? https://t.co/rO6Gkl1ae3 — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenSchumer to the House Managers: “Would you please respond to the answer that was just given by the president’s counsel?” That question from @SenRonJohnson was about whether the Senate should 𝘳𝘦𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵 a subpoena for John Bolton. https://t.co/UFmFz0UYGM — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenatorMenendez to House Managers: Why did the president suddenly become concerned about corruption in early 2019? #SenateQuestions https://t.co/oZifZOGRkj — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
.@SenJeffMerkley @MartinHeinrich to president’s lawyers: Clarify the answer on Bolton's book When did the president’s defense team learn of the manuscript's allegations? Was the determination to block it on the basis it contains classified information made by career officials? https://t.co/YNfVWCJ5Gc — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenatorDurbin to the House Managers: Would you please respond to the answer that was just given by the president’s counsel? https://t.co/X3g5INUL6x — PolitiTweet.org
Senate Democrats @SenateDems
Question from @SenatorTomUdall, @SenBlumenthal, @SenatorLeahy, and @SenWhitehouse: By the standard the president’s counsel has applied to Hunter Biden, should Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump’s potential conflicts of interest with foreign governments also come under investigation? https://t.co/vgmBeY7eQa — PolitiTweet.org