ian bremmer

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@kingsleytweets_ @ruhlamn @DavidSacks that depends. still a w for sacks if your personal alignment with sacks > importance of relevant facts. which drives a decent portion of twitter, as per this thread. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

fbi director christopher wray: china has stolen more personal & business data from americans than all other nations… …combined https://t.co/fUOe5Ns5mG — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@BillyM2k @IntenseRealism @DavidSacks absolutely. too much point scoring, not enough benefit of the doubt. following you now, happy to chat at some point. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

banksy’s seven murals spotted across ukraine https://t.co/dRIICu15Ue — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@BillyM2k @IntenseRealism @DavidSacks also agree completely. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@BillyM2k @DavidSacks strong point of agreement dude — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@DavidSacks i opposed those who argued the invasion was not fully—100%—the responsibility of putin and the russian government. that remains my view today. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@DavidSacks when you criticize someone for having one position and it turns out they don’t actually hold that position (i’ve literally never said ukraine should take crimea militarily), you stand corrected. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@DavidSacks ok, i guess i accept the withdrawal of your initial criticism. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

g20 leaders plant mangroves in bali seems friendlyish https://t.co/ARvyKqrtmJ — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@nagrani14 @DavidSacks sure. find a broadly respected moderator. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@Defi_Camel @cdn_concerned @elonmusk the difference is that the territory russia invaded on feb 24 has to be returned to the ukrainians. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@BillyM2k @IntenseRealism @DavidSacks that’s not a minor nuance. it’s the difference between capitulating to the kremlin’s war aims with zero chance of ukraine/nato acceptance and a potentially workable (even if unlikely) negotiated outcome. oy. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@DavidSacks @Sentyst i’ve publicly said crimea is subject to unique conditions and needs to be a matter of negotiation—not military conquest—dozens of times. from the beginning of the war. christ, i lived there in the 90s. do i need to actually find the videos for you? — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@BillyM2k @DavidSacks key point: responsibility for the invasion is 100% on the kremlin. return to feb 24 territorial lines has to be a minimum for any negotiation. putin will not accept this through voluntary concession. ukraine needs to be supported militarily to impose it. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@BillyM2k @DavidSacks key point: responsibility for the invasion is 100% on the kremlin. return to feb 24 territorial lines has to be a minimum for any negotiation. putin will not accept this through voluntary concession. ukraine needs to be supported military to impose it. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

RT @ianbremmer: @DavidSacks key point: responsibility for the invasion is 100% on the kremlin. return to feb 24 territorial lines has to… — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@DavidSacks key point: responsibility for the invasion is 100% on the kremlin. return to feb 24 territorial lines has to be a minimum for any negotiation. putin will not accept this through voluntary concession. ukraine needs to be supported military to impose it. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@AlexanderV878 @DavidSacks correct. the responsibility for the invasion remains 100% on the kremlin. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@joshdthompson yes. musk was reiterating private kremlin line, unacceptable to both ukraine and nato. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@Sentyst @DavidSacks time is not yet right for negotiations. but we should prepare for it. crimea v unlikely to be retaken by force. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

RT @ianbremmer: @DavidSacks read the whole thread, david ukraine first needed to be fully supported to get their territory back, by a stro… — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@DavidSacks read the whole thread, david ukraine first needed to be fully supported to get their territory back, by a strong and unified nato feb 24 land illegally taken by russia can’t be retaken without that no need to throw “stones” — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@MariaFaticov 1. crimea population overwhelmingly pro-russian 2. substantial entrenched russian military base there 3. ukraine leaders privately skeptical about idea of attacking crimea militarily 4. some in nato concerned about putin potential “red line” on crimea — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@SidPolitics agreed. which is why ukraine has to be in a position to impose minimum conditions. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@ShamEyeWitness @Marcusdstewart i do, very much. other than more humanitarian aid on the ground, i don’t see how that can be prevented (short of direct nato war against russia). — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@FellaOfMetal none of it. zero. negotiations will only succeed if conditions can be imposed by ukraine and nato. there’s no putin “agreement” that you can accept at face value. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@53r611 hardly. i propose supporting ukraine to become (or, at this point, remain) the best defended country in europe and a full member of the eu. i also support all the territory russia has taken since feb 24 being returned to ukraine. crimea should be a matter for negotiation. — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

@NationalEscape read the whole thread. thank you — PolitiTweet.org

ian bremmer @ianbremmer

negotiations don’t work because putin is prepared to compromise. he isn’t. if there’s any chance, it’s because ukraine and nato achieve a position to impose outcomes. — PolitiTweet.org