Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 182 of 2655.
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@kpedraja @jonstewart Agreed — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@rubydeuxdetroit @ErikWemple @maggieNYT Btw I share your disdain for trump but he still needs to be convicted for what he did. Until then, though wildly undeserving, he gets to ride on the need for proof. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@rubydeuxdetroit @ErikWemple @maggieNYT She did not have some stuff confirmed initially, which is common. and if she published and misses it’s devastating. Also they lie until they don’t. You can’t declare them a liar (even if they are). You need to prove it. With Trump, an endless task as he is a mendacious fuck — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@rubydeuxdetroit @ErikWemple @maggieNYT You are citing one piece. Want to go look at my initial Uber coverage and then look at the body of work, which started with okay cool and ended quite different. Same with Facebook. Sorry but overall the times and post have been rigorous. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@JoeFedorowicz @tonytribby @ErikWemple @maggieNYT @ParkerMolloy Yep — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@GOP_Til_DJT Exactly right — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
RT @shakergeek: @karaswisher @jonstewart Any billionaires out there wanna write a check for Kara and Jon to start a proper big J journalism… — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@shakergeek @jonstewart Ha. We’d end up screwing that rich dude. Figuratively. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@cougar_gold @ErikWemple @maggieNYT Like he asked: exactly how — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@pbaker @ErikWemple @maggieNYT I would not agree but I get it. She really cannot win here anymore. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@lizhiser @jonstewart Thx. He really was good here — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@rubydeuxdetroit @ErikWemple @maggieNYT This is untrue. You clearly did not read the body of her work. Overall, it wasn’t soft. This book certainly is not. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@JoeFedorowicz @tonytribby @ErikWemple @maggieNYT @ParkerMolloy He did not disagree as much as put in woodward’s defense of himself. Thinking on that book, not sure it was as critical. We all knew via reporting in real time that Trump was lying — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@cougar_gold @ErikWemple @maggieNYT I think this has been years of attacking her and being quiet about how overblown it is. She delivers in this book via facts and that still is not good enough for the haters. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@cougar_gold @ErikWemple @maggieNYT Except she didn’t. Try to bring actual facts. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@DSSebastian1 Well I like the Klobuchar-Grassley bill — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@loganthomison @jonstewart Ahaaa. That was a good show — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@OpenIntro @WildlyLiberal @ErikWemple @maggieNYT What stuff exactly that was actually important did not appear in the times? Their editors — not her btw — made that determination. Once confirmed — and that is no small thing — it was published. But you have not read the book, as I have, so why am I debating with you? — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@dino18992167 @ErikWemple @maggieNYT You know she also admits to mistakes as should all good reporters. They does not mean bought and paid for. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
People always ask me why I am so busy. Here’s the reason. https://t.co/l2EHMon2lA — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@Mossback @OpenIntro @WildlyLiberal @ErikWemple @maggieNYT Ha ha — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@RichardJSiegel @jonstewart Full agree — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@pbaker @ErikWemple @maggieNYT Um the book makes it clear he is dumb. She has no need to say it and btw she basically did. READ IT. Or you can just rage. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@olsonweeks @jeremychrysler @jonstewart Me too. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@JoeFedorowicz @ErikWemple @maggieNYT @ParkerMolloy Can’t help you there. Scott does Scott! — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@JoeFedorowicz @ErikWemple @maggieNYT @ParkerMolloy Here’s a different example. When I report or write something tough on Elon, his stans attack me and his committed detractors celebrate. When I write about an obvious achievement, it flips. Honestly, they can both go fish and I will call it as I see it. (FYI, imho Trump is awful) — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@JoeFedorowicz @ErikWemple @maggieNYT @ParkerMolloy I would ask you to actually read the book. It is a truly ugly portait of Trump and she uses facts to show not tell. The issue is people love tell and not show these days. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@JoeFedorowicz @ErikWemple @maggieNYT @ParkerMolloy Btw a lot of what the 1/6 committee is surfacing under oath, is what was reported by a lot of folks and denied by Trump folks and now is confirmed. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@JoeFedorowicz @ErikWemple @maggieNYT @ParkerMolloy I saw it. Most definitely she and a lot of reporters made some mistakes but they certainly did amazing stuff that was an indictment of him (see tax series from the times too). It made zero difference and lots of folks want a Watergate moment. It’s not going to go down that way. — PolitiTweet.org
Kara Swisher @karaswisher
@OpenIntro @WildlyLiberal @ErikWemple @maggieNYT Well that is a good skill and good luck with it, but you don’t know squat since I am assuming you did not actually read the book since that would require homework. It paints a devastating portrait of Trump via FACTS. Sorry if that is not good enough for you. — PolitiTweet.org
