Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 142 of 553.
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@LaurenGoode @KaranThakkar97 @verge @reckless @backlon @vjeranpavic Yes! — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @karaswisher: Some slopes are just not slippery via @NYTOpinion https://t.co/ElsLJBfZfe — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ But we all have a right to question their judgement in printing any particular piece. Not their right to do so, which of course goes without question. But their judgement. I question their judgement in this and other recent incidents. And I regularly read conservatives. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@tjdonegan @jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ I won’t defend every newspaper opinion editor. I never worked for one. But there’s no need for an “opinion” label on print op-ed pieces, because they run in the opinion pages. It’s all opinion by definition. The need for a label is online, on social, where that context is gone. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ Depends on the paper. And don’t forget that, at many newspapers, most of the op-ed page is devoted to columnists who are employees, some of whom often disagree with the editorials, but many of whom are ideological allies and sometimes even participate in writing the editorials. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ Right. “Op”, as in op-ed, merely means the page physically *opposite* the editorial page. It’s an old and lasting print newspaper industry term, the way “A1” is a print industry term widely used for the front page. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@tjdonegan @jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ I disagree that they all operate their op-ed pages the same. They don’t. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@Ned_Newhouse @jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ It won’t matter. Editorial page editors have a wide variety of views about how they use their op-ed pages. But I bet all believe they have a responsibility to curate and edit even pieces with which they disagree. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ Furthermore, even if the goal is to feature different views, that doesn’t relieve the opinion editors of the responsibility to curate what they choose to run. They would never run an Op-Ed piece by the head of the KKK justifying lynchings, for instance. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@jason_kint @reckless @nytopinion @WSJ I am 100% sure about this, after a 47 year career in journalism. Op-Ed doesn’t mean opposition to the editorials, but the page opposite the editorial page. It is almost always run by the same people, as it is at the Times. The Times is only one newspaper. Others are different. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@reckless You’re right. It’s a bogus argument. Opinion pages are meant to reflect the opinion of the publisher and sometimes reasonable opposing views. @nytopinion has been off course on this under Bennet, unlike the @WSJ edit page. Where’s the Op-Ed by a senator opposing use of troops? — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @CaseyNewton: CES stands for Coronavirus Electronics Show and the price of entry is now moderate to severe risk of hospitalization. stil… — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @alanmillerNLP: The debate over the role & responsibilities of @Facebook & @Twitter is all the more pressing amid the protests, pandemic… — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @themoko: This month, in coordination with lit mag editor @amrjoian575, Black writers can send prose to Aram for full line notes and an… — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@LAflyr @ACLU These are regulations. They don’t obviate the constitution. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
We often think the 1st Amendment covers only freedom of speech, religion and press. But it also guarantees two more rights which were violated when the peaceful rally near the WH was violently shut down: the right to peacefully assemble, and the right to petition the government. https://t.co/jQZUGmReNA — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @LaurenGoode: .@lourynstrampe and I put together a @Wired guide for protesting safely — which includes educating yourself, knowing your… — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @BeschlossDC: After President Hoover in 1932 ordered US Army to disperse unarmed vets marching in DC to demand their World War I bonuses… — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
This piece by @FCC commissioner @JRosenworcel is really scary. We must protect our ability to communicate, to protest, and to conduct election campaigns via the Internet. Right now, she explains, because of an old law, whoever is president can shut it down. — PolitiTweet.org
Jessica Rosenworcel @JRosenworcel
Time to review this one again. Could the US government shut down the internet? https://t.co/AmfrWSitTk
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
Make sure you have the facts, not hoaxes and conspiracy theories. And then VOTE, VOTE, VOTE. #noexcuses @NewsLitProject — PolitiTweet.org
The News Literacy Project @NewsLitProject
1/ As Americans in 9 states & DC head to the polls today to exercise the most fundamental right in our democracy, w… https://t.co/ydVdU…
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@gmikewebb Thank you for voting, Mike. I voted too. But by mail. In this moment of peril for our country, it’s more important than ever to VOTE, VOTE, VOTE. #noexcuses — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@meredithperry My deepest condolences, Meredith. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @saltercrs: We are not helpless. There are solutions! — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
Here’s conservative columnist and former George W. Bush aide, @MJGerson, on Trump this morning. https://t.co/jKI0Ygfsw5 — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@DrSharathS @karaswisher The angry Walt has been writing angry things for decades. — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
@defcon_5 @WSJ Oh, it would be much, much worse v — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
The @WSJ editorial page warns Trump not to militarize law enforcement. — PolitiTweet.org
Bill Grueskin @BGrueskin
WSJ edit page on military intervention: “U.S. soldiers are trained for combat against a foreign enemy, not riot co… https://t.co/VcuzVpQ1HH
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @alanmillerNLP: This deeply disturbing moment is a good time for us to remember that the First Amendment of the Constitution protects fr… — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
RT @NewsLitProject: “This is a hashtag that was clearly started by an account that was fake and was pushed by fake accounts." - @DarrenLin… — PolitiTweet.org
Walt Mossberg @waltmossberg
The Houston police chief criticizes the President and strongly urges people to exercise their right to VOTE. — PolitiTweet.org
Christiane Amanpour @camanpour
Houston Police Chief @ArtAcevedo: “Let me just say this to the President of the United States, on behalf of the pol… https://t.co/FXWubTB7hq