EFF

EFF @EFF

A lei brasileira excepciona citações se mencionados o autor e a origem do conteúdo. Se um usuário esquecer de nomear o autor, isso gera a obrigação de pagamento? 8/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Mesmo os novos complementos levantam mais questões. Por exemplo, a nova proposta diz que não há dever de remuneração quando usuários compartilham uma URL – mas isso se aplica quando a URL compartilhada gera uma prévia automática do artigo com a notícia? 7/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

O novo texto deixa as questões mais cruciais para futura regulamentação ou interpretação dos tribunais. Por exemplo: qual é o “uso” que gera a obrigação de remuneração? Como o pagamento deverá ser calculado? Como será distribuído? 6/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Em vez de conferir um veto cultural à imprensa, legisladores e reguladores deveriam olhar para o mercado de publicidade online, e promover competição e transparência. 5/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

A regra termina por assumir que os direitos autorais dão à imprensa o poder de licenciar (e assim controlar e bloquear) a citação e a discussão de notícias. 4/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Apoiar-se nos direitos autorais para conseguir um acordo justo para veículos de imprensa é arriscado, com consequências para a concentração da mídia, a liberdade de expressão e a imprensa livre. 3/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Em nossa análise, explicamos por que este PL não é o lugar certo para a regra de remuneração. 2/ https://t.co/tlXURpuvZA — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

O #PLFakeNews tem um novo texto alterando a #RegraDeRemuneração exigindo que as plataformas paguem por conteúdos de notícias. Reconhecemos que houve uma nova tentativa, mas essa regra pouco especificada ainda não está pronta para se tornar lei. O Congresso deve retirá-la do PL.1/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Rather than shoehorning a rushed, problematic proposal into the Fake News Bill, rapporteur @orlandosilva should remove the remuneration obligation from the bill. fin/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

You just can't use copyright to unrig the monopolized, unfair ad market. As we wrote, addressing #BigTech's crooked practices can't be accomplished by copy-pasting the industry's toxic "Move Fast and Break Things" ethic. 7/ https://t.co/hHI97XuURF — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Brazil's copyright exempts quotes if the source and author are credited. If a user forgets to name the author, does that trigger a payment? Must platforms now monitor all user-posted quotations to make sure they pay for (or delete) incorrectly formatted quotes? 6/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Even the new "clarifications" raise more questions than they answer. For example, the new draft says that no remuneration is owed when a user shares a URL - but does that apply when the shared URL triggers an automated preview of an article? 5/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

The new draft leaves the most crucial questions unanswered, punting them to subsequent regulation or a court ruling. For example: What constitutes a 'use' that triggers the remuneration obligation? How should the payment be calculated? How will they be distributed? 4/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

The rule assumes that copyright gives publishers the power to license (and thus control and block) quoting and discussing the news. Rather than giving a cultural veto to publishers, lawmakers and regulators should address adtech, and promote competition and transparency. 3/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

In our analysis, we explained why a remuneration rule has no place in this bill. Tldr: relying on copyright to get a fair deal for publishers is a dangerous gambit, with consequences for media monopolization, free expression and the free press. 2/ https://t.co/hHI97XuURF — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Brazil’s #FakeNews Bill has a new draft amending the #RemunerationRule requiring tech platforms to pay for publishers’ news content. It's nice that the drafters tried again with this underspecified rule, but it's still not ready to be a law. Congress should delete the rule. 1/ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

A @DHSgov and @ICEgov program has spied on visa applicants' social media for years, largely in secret. We're suing to learn more. https://t.co/rpalpwqRBV — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

An @eff supporter found a GPS device attached to her car. You won't believe what happened next! https://t.co/pmhnOfgt7I — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

EFF loves open source tech. That's why we're proud to support #OpenSource101, put on by @AllThingsOpen! Register for free today to learn more about the fundamentals of open source and to chat with EFF at our virtual booth! https://t.co/wjmWBdGiKs — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Legislators, having failed to modify what messages are on social media, are now trying to legislate how those messages are shared. This is a dangerous step in the wrong direction. https://t.co/Id3Gxivfjt — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

It's easy for stalkers to use tracking devices to harass & threaten their victims; it should be easier for victims to find out if they’re being tracked so they can protect themselves. @EFF examines Tile’s new scanning app. https://t.co/ZzUeHnb8Zv — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Organizing local events is an important (and fun) way to start defending digital rights in your neighborhood. https://t.co/yEJo85PxCC — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Are you a lawyer who's also a big fan of EFF? Why not join the team! We've got an open position for an IP litigator to cover patents and other matters. https://t.co/navZxf5vDZ — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Big Tech’s walled gardens are coming down! EU institutions have agreed that Google and Facebook must embrace interoperability, allowing users to chat with friends across different messaging services—an important step towards a fair and competitive market. https://t.co/lGcTDstagj — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Following intense pressure from residents and community and civil rights groups, the San Francisco mayor has pulled a ballot measure that would have gutted the city’s landmark surveillance oversight law. https://t.co/oTJTrr9xBO — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

The Student Test Taker Privacy Protection Act is a simple bill that should give the people harmed by remote proctoring—test takers—the opportunity to protect their data and privacy. https://t.co/rIaK7HXOf3 — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Proposed changes to New York's IDNYC raise serious privacy concerns for it users, particularly among undocumented residents. Join EFA member, @STOPSpyingNY, April 4th for a panel discussion to evaluate these changes and potential privacy safeguards. https://t.co/F2zBaujq1y — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Every test of a surveillance robot done by Customs and Border Protection is another step toward policing-by-robot becoming a norm in the U.S. https://t.co/g5Emj41ChY — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Online behavioral targeting is almost single-handedly responsible for the worst privacy problems on the internet today. https://t.co/1WoJxqiy4L — PolitiTweet.org

EFF @EFF

Targeted advertising based on online behavior doesn’t just hurt privacy. It also contributes to a range of other harms. https://t.co/1WoJxq0WGb — PolitiTweet.org