Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 523 of 2404.
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Yep. — PolitiTweet.org
Edward Hunter Christie @EHunterChristie
@McFaul Indeed! And the trigger was former disgraced UA Pres Yanukovych walking away from a Free Trade agreement wi… https://t.co/mvEFcQPNFI
Michael McFaul @McFaul
I’ll send in a few weeks. (But “warning label” — its over a 1000 ms pages long right now) — PolitiTweet.org
Dmitri Alperovitch @DAlperovitch
@McFaul Thx! Happy to read and provide feedback!
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @McFaul: I met Putin in 1991. I've written about him for 2 decades. I sat in the room with him for 5 years during the Obama administrati… — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
No Putin did not “invade” Kazakhstan. — PolitiTweet.org
BenAris @bneeditor
@McFaul That’s bc it’s legal under CSTO deal. Presidents allowed to call on other country military help esp when ha… https://t.co/FmgXgaQ4Q1
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @SchatzEd: Wouldn't be a terrible time to hear from the UN Human Rights Council about human rights in Kazakhstan. (KZ is a member of UN… — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Tokayev called Putin for help, not Xi. But Xi supported Putin and the CSTO. Post-imperial times linger long. Dreams of a Sino-Russian split are still in the very distant future. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @CooleyOnEurasia: Not a “talk shop”- my latest on the CSTO and how regional organizations protect regimes in Central Asia and beyond ht… — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Both are autocratic revisionist powers. One, so far, is more revisionist regarding the international system than the other. That will probably change with time. Happy to send you my draft book on the subject and get your feedback. (I discuss every fact on your list in detail) — PolitiTweet.org
Dmitri Alperovitch @DAlperovitch
Excuse me?! Did someone already forget Hong Kong, Xinjiang and Tibet? South China Sea Islands? Sinking Vietnamese f… https://t.co/bkkqydRo5W
Michael McFaul @McFaul
This. — PolitiTweet.org
Dr Maxine David #European @MaxineDavid
Minor rant going on in my head about people making EuroMaidan about NATO instead of EU. Even if you're going to arg… https://t.co/TmX1mdfP4Q
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @M_Baranowski: Useful map from @nytimes of Russian forces near Ukraine’s borders - more 👉 https://t.co/fMHRrlMaUs https://t.co/AsNomoSwqk — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
@JDfiloso4ADR No — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @polenz_r: You are absolutely right @McFaul https://t.co/ca6CbckteJ — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
I met Putin in 1991. I've written about him for 2 decades. I sat in the room with him for 5 years during the Obama administration. Those who believe that Putin will stop undermining Ukrainian sovereignty & democracy with a non-expansion NATO "guarantee" don't know Putin. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @McFaul: Putin does not want a stable and predictable relationship with the United States or the West. And we don't have the means to fo… — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @McFaul: Biden's team has to talk to Putin's team next week. But let's be clear this is not a negotiation between earnest equals. By thr… — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
A serious European security dialogue must include the security of individual Europeans -- the 13,000 plus killed in Donbas & dozens in Odessa, those assassinated in London, Berlin & Moscow & those who were almost killed in Tomsk & Salisbury. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @USAmbNATO: #JustTheFacts✅ @NATO is not instilling anti-Russia sentiment and seeking confrontation. While Russia has security concerns,… — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Offering limits on US missile defenses in Europe that threaten Russia should be easy as current US missile defenses (EPAA) in Poland and Romania have no capabilities against Russian targets. Such limits would by definition have to be on FUTURE deployments. — PolitiTweet.org
Samuel Charap @scharap
U.S. plans to discuss missile deployments with Russia as part of effort to defuse Ukraine crisis https://t.co/ITvYw8ARJp
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Read @sanger & @EricSchmittNYT on the "U.S. Details Costs of a Russian Invasion of Ukraine." As usual, you can tell their sources for this story are impeccable. Hope @KremlinRussia_E @mfa_russia Ryabkov are reading too. https://t.co/MbLoisE3L9 — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Wow. Arrest of Massimov is a major move, further evidence that an elite power struggle is a significant component of #KazakhstanProtests. — PolitiTweet.org
Alexander Baunov @baunov
THREAD 1/6 Karim #Masimov, the head of the main security service in #Kazakhstan and a close ally of former presiden… https://t.co/M2yOpvKtLG
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Congrats NDSU. Great run for my @MSUBobcats . — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
PS as a revisionist power, Putins Russia to date has done much more damage than Xis China — annexation, occupation, invasion, assassination, and now threatening to invade again. Maybe that will change in future. But today, no comparison. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Serious question. Why does the Biden team never say that they want a “stable an predictable relationship with China”? Why is that phrase only used in reference to Russia? or am I wrong & they do is it? — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Putin is "ready to invade" That doesn't mean that Putin will invade. With bad options and weak leverage, I believe the Biden team has done a very solid job in signaling seriousness & buying time. Ball is now in Putin's court, as to be communicated by (my old colleague) Ryabkov. — PolitiTweet.org
Dmitri Alperovitch @DAlperovitch
Ordinarily yes. But if they are as convinced as they say publicly (and privately) that Putin is ready to invade, th… https://t.co/BGsA8pVtom
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @McFaul: There will be no substantive negotiations about European security -- no trades, no deals, no concessions. Instead, the Biden te… — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
My strong sense is that Biden's team is ready to engage in substantive negotiations if Putin signals he is serious. I was responding to naive claims/advice that Sherman is going to or should be offering some big trades in this first mtg. That's not how real diplomacy works. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
RT @MGongadze: I have ask @ABlinken about it today, about US reaction and need of UN Security Council meeting. — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Did not know. Thanks for sharing. — PolitiTweet.org
Richard Gowan @RichardGowan1
FWIW (which is not a lot) the UNSC has routine discussions on Central Asia at the end of the month (27th) but these… https://t.co/qAOC575lpf
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Very strong statement from @SecBlinken on Russia, Ukraine and European Security. https://t.co/tPprTM78D8 — PolitiTweet.org
Michael McFaul @McFaul
Biden's team has to talk to Putin's team next week. But let's be clear this is not a negotiation between earnest equals. By threatening to invade Ukraine unless he gets what he wants, Putin is no different from a cyber thief asking for ransomware or a kidnapper holding a hostage — PolitiTweet.org
