Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 235 of 516.
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@Joodles #MSNBC is always my choice. CSpan will likely cover it too. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@DianeLois4 Yes. Even in political cases. Google Susan MacDougall Whitewater. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@NastyOldWomyn @Denisemarie85 @MuellerSheWrote @MDTomitsch @glennkirschner2 @Teri_Kanefield @Delavegalaw Many criminal prosecutions depend on testimony of criminals so no reason not to use testimony of @MichaelCohen212 plus I find him credible based on his public appearances. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@MelyanaKlue It shouldn't. Calling it out is proper. Her response was proper. It just needs to be in context. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@carpediem_vici CREW was there for Trump. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@leeleeResists @Teri_Kanefield @TulliusCicero43 @NastyOldWomyn @GregoryBTrotte1 @or_tobie @MDTomitsch @glennkirschner2 @Delavegalaw @TheJusticeDept There can be no clues if you understand the rule of silence. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@AmyH34112913 @MuellerSheWrote Was it maybe a diaper pin then? #JillsPins started in high school. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@MarkGlasstette5 I believe OLC Opinion is incorrect in law and policy & that a sitting president can be indicted for crimes committed before or during his presidency, but shouldn't be except where evidence is extraordinarily strong. Rule dates to time of Watergate in fall 1973. Reaffirmed 2000. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@CrowQuell @MarkGlasstette5 He was not charged with a crime. Articles if impeachment were voted. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@medit8now @pjlacasse22 @UROCKlive1 Much appreciated. TY. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@InfoSecAdrian #SayThisNotThat Enlarging SCOTUS, not packing the Court. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@pjlacasse22 @UROCKlive1 Knew you meant that! — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@pjlacasse22 @UROCKlive1 Thank you so much! — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@sally_ann_cole TY — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@NastyOldWomyn @Roadette33 @davitydave @Teri_Kanefield @RichardCheese @TulliusCicero43 @GregoryBTrotte1 @or_tobie @MDTomitsch @glennkirschner2 @Delavegalaw Third reason -- to prevent witnesses being identified and subjected to pressure or collaborating on a "story" 4th -- to prevent warning suspect who might flee. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@Julie122150 @MuellerSheWrote Will do. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@KenCox @MuellerSheWrote Gosh thanks. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@GregoryBTrotte1 @RichardCheese @Teri_Kanefield @TulliusCicero43 @NastyOldWomyn @or_tobie @MDTomitsch… https://t.co/YUJFWR05cM — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@epbsfo @MuellerSheWrote It's me! — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@MuellerSheWrote Fun idea https://t.co/wnlyJ5TW3i — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@ManardNancy Where are you? — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@Teri_Kanefield @TulliusCicero43 @NastyOldWomyn @GregoryBTrotte1 @or_tobie @MDTomitsch @glennkirschner2 @Delavegalaw Here's 2 of many reasons for DOJ to stay silent unless they indict. 1. It's a crime to reveal grand jury testimony 2. It prevents tarnishing someone's reputation (a la Comey's comments re Hillary) if evidence is insuffucient to indict That's why we don't know what DOJ is doing. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@MaryLTrump You're the best. Thank you. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Please join us this week -- and every week and send us your questions and comments at https://t.co/veOr00faUZ and look for our really great swag at https://t.co/X1r8M5IrU8. — PolitiTweet.org
Barb McQuade @BarbMcQuade
In new episode of #SistersInLaw podcast, we discussed Bannon‘s defiance of Jan 6 subpoena, DOJ‘s police investigati… https://t.co/37FvBTinYz
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@BarbMcQuade @JoyceWhiteVance @KimberlyEAtkins Or be like me and use for the farmers market our to carry everything you need for the day in this great #SistersInLaw tote. Books, heels bec you walk in gym shoes, what else? — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
I'll be watching the vote. Will you? — PolitiTweet.org
Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1
The January 6th select committee has scheduled a vote for 7:30pm on Tuesday on a report recommending criminal contempt for Steve Bannon.
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
A great solution. #CodifyRoe — PolitiTweet.org
Amy Klobuchar @amyklobuchar
It shouldn’t have to be this complicated. Codify Roe. https://t.co/Ewefy6uWi2
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Time to wake-up the threats to democracy and justice posed by Trump and the insurrectionists says #JillsPin. Joining @AliciaOnMSNBC with @FrankFigliuzzi1 & @woodruffbets at 6 CT/7 ET on #MSNBC. Hope to see you! https://t.co/tHMDmncAMS — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
If I'd know @AliciaOnMSNBC would have a conducter who broke music's glass ceiling, I would have saved today's #JillsPin to honor @JoyceWhiteVance's chickens and worn this one instead. https://t.co/Tv67hzStC9 — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Correct, and based on the public facts, it seems like a good case for DOJ to file criminal contempt. And, it doesn't have to take long to get to a final court decision. Watergate case went from subpoena to SCOTUS decision in just over 3 months & Pres resignation 2 wks after that. — PolitiTweet.org
Joyce Alene @JoyceWhiteVance
This is absolutely the correct & only response from DOJ: DOJ will make its “own independent decisions in all prosec… https://t.co/M2h5Z…