Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced
capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been
deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet
interface.
Showing page 215 of 516.
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
7/Parenthood is not the issue. Liberty and equality are. If 15 wks is okay, why not 6. If Roe thrown out, same sex marriage. contraception & more will be next. Note: question from Court about why 15 wks isn't enough time for anyone to get an abortion wasn't fullly answered... — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
6/Leaving this to states means some Americans will have less rights than constitution grants. Barrett's argument that the burden of parenthood can be avoided by giving away the child born after a forced pregnancy is one she should be ashamed to have said. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
5/There are many values to stare decisis (reliance on precedents) and abandoning it here will, as Justice Sotomayor said, leaves a stench of politics and hurts the credibiity of the Supreme Court and the rule of law. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
4/The current law is based on a definable. enforceable and logical line - viability - that balances rights of the pregnant with those (if any, depending on your religion and philosophy) of a fetus. There is no logic to 15 weeks... — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
3/ Federalist Society have worked to eliminate it. Compaing overruling segregation to overruling Roe is ridiculous. One ended a Constitutional violation, the other takes away a Constitutional right without anything changing in law, fact, or medicine... — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
2/ Here are my random reactions to Dobbs arguments: If Roe is overruled, it would be the 1st reversal of an existing constitutional right. Past cases have expanded not contracted rights. Abortion has been a right for nearly 50 yrs - during which Republican party and Federalist... — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
1/I was too upset by SCOTUS abortion arguments to tweet. I can't repeat Mississippi's arguments to overrule Roe because they are ridiculous. Lawyers for the clinics & the US (Rikelman & SG Prelogar) were brilliant and made almost all the points needed, but it fell on deaf ears... — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@mtf6342 @maddow @JoyAnnReid @JoyceWhiteVance @SRuhle @YNB @NicolleDWallace @BetteMidler @cher @MiaFarrow @PattyArquette @RoArquette @FLOTUS @KamalaHarris @SenateDems Read and sign up for @The19th, news at the intersection of gender and law and policy. https://t.co/zHPiUgs3jL — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@jaydcar If you, like me, need to look up meaning of kakocracy, here it is -- and it's totally appropriate: Rule or government by the worst of the people. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Not a good day for the Ghislaine Maxwell prosecution. — PolitiTweet.org
julie k. brown @jkbjournalist
NEW: Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyer exposes cracks in prosecution’s case. | Miami Herald https://t.co/1MVSZ4BSHG
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Exactly. Also, in no other case has SCOTUS taken away a right recognized for nearly 50 years. MS argument that overruling Roe is like overruling segregation is ridiculous. One takes away a right recognized by the Constitution, one cures a wrong that violates the Constitution. — PolitiTweet.org
Ruth Marcus @RuthMarcus
"Nowhere else does this Court recognize a right to end a human life." Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart i… https://t.co/Tms9YNZWzn
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Embarrassing hardly says it. Justified does. — PolitiTweet.org
NBC News @NBCNews
CNN host Chris Cuomo said that he never meant to compromise any colleagues by advising his brother and called his s… https://t.co/Py6lNMpBbS
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
.@Lawrence @TheLastWord talking to @RepAdamSchiff about Jeffrey Clark's belated claim of 5th A privilege asked a great question: How will Committee evaluate legitimacy of that claim? That would require that Clark claim 5th during his deposition in response to specific question. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@NewKidInTown47 @HouseDemocrats @KamalaHarris @SenateDems @MoveOn @HouseJudiciary @Lawrence @maddow @DNCWarRoom… https://t.co/mdCL5L6kso — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@citizen4truth11 @KimberlyEAtkins @BarbMcQuade @JoyceWhiteVance Thank you. We all felt passionately about this. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@SherrySherrmorr @ChrisCuomo Advising is 1 thing; concealing it until evidence made it public is another. But Chris' real ethical violaton is offering to use his CNN sources to get info to help his brother. Had he stopped with just using his communication skills to advise or draft a release, maybe. Not this. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Jan. 6 Committee Closes In On Trump And His Allies https://t.co/Bbc1eBgfKj — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Teachers Union President Randi Weingarten Blasts Violence & Threats to School Boards: FULL Interview https://t.co/JiijE5Z3jM — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
CNN does the right thing. @ChrisCuomo is out indefinitely. The evidence of his abuse of his role as a journalist to help his brother was too overwhelming to ignore. https://t.co/WJXzN5r50q — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Tomorrow morning the new @iGenPolitics_ is available for your listening pleasure. @rweingarten is a fount of knowledge with a clear communication style about education, school boards and so much more. Listen wherever you get your podcasts or watch on YouTube. Please follow us. https://t.co/oVTToyFoy7 — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Before @iGenPolitics_ next podcast is released, be sure to watch the last one with @amandalitman and check out our… https://t.co/xS4OShLV99
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Join me on @TheLastWord at 9 CT/10 ET talking about Jan 6 Committee's right to former president's records and todays Court of Appeals argument plus more. Wearing a #JillsPin for the constitutional & important role of Congress in oversight and legislating to prevent another Jan 6. https://t.co/RTws3BHZEO — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
As I predicted, DC Court of Appeals skeptical of Trrmp arguments for withholding crucial documents. Jan 6 Cmtee could (and IMHO should) prevail. US v Nixon and GSA v Nixon support my prediction. https://t.co/U4YST9sgxB — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
3/Of course, current SCOTUS composition and views of Executive power worries me, but as lower court said, "the president is not a king, and [Trump] is not president." — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
2/Based on #Watergate's US v Nixon, the essential role of Congressional oversight & legislating fixes to prevent another Jan 6, & the critical need of Congress on behalf of the American people for the subpoenaed info, I believe Trump will lose this, appeal to SCOTUS & lose there. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
1/Today's appellate court arguments are vital to the outcome of Jan 6 investigation, Bannon's contempt indirectly and Congressional oversight in general. https://t.co/XBLPlBWe63 — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@JoyceWhiteVance That's funnier than claiming Executive Privilege. Neither Aries I these facts based on my Watergate experience. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@kzaiman @OCRose Attitude! — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
Before @iGenPolitics_ next podcast is released, be sure to watch the last one with @amandalitman and check out our 100+ others w fascinating guests. Don't miss any future shows with me and @Victorshi2020. LISTEN: https://t.co/ZydxYNZIkN WATCH: https://t.co/hgwNphckGc — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@HelenArmstrong5 TY for fighting. This us important. — PolitiTweet.org
Jill Wine-Banks @JillWineBanks
@JesseBrockVan I read and watched. Facts not quite as you stated Shooter and judge divorcing. His relationship with dead man's ex-wife seems irrelevant given the divorce. Fight seems about custody of dead man's child. I get the self defense argument under TX law but think law us barbaric. — PolitiTweet.org
