Deleted tweet detection is currently running at reduced capacity due to changes to the Twitter API. Some tweets that have been deleted by the tweet author may not be labeled as deleted in the PolitiTweet interface.

Showing page 168 of 400.

Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani: “We are asking you for a hearing...and once you decide, you decide if the remedy is too broad or too narrow.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani keeps claiming that ballots not being observed was “a deliberate plan”by Democrats from Philadelphia to Detroit. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani says the issue of poll observers allegedly not getting access isn’t a state issue, this belongs in federal court. “As far as we are concerned those ballots could have been from Mickey Mouse.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani said “the conduct was premeditated, planned...and the purpose was to have those ballots examined in secret.” “The remedy is required because conduct was egregious...We are not asking for entire election to be reversed. These ballots were not examined... “ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Judge Brann asks Giuliani: “You are alleging that two people were denied their right to vote... You are asking this court to invalidate 6.8 million votes thereby disenfranchising every voter in the commonwealth. Can you tell me how this result can possibly be justified?” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

DNC lawyer points out Trump campaign has not made a voter fraud case in court in Pennsylvania - at all. “Plaintiff’s concerns and what they took issue with is not the ballot. It’s the voter’s choices.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Secretary of State attorneys in federal lawsuit are seizing on today’s Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion that poll observers from either party were not illegally kept too far away from mail in ballot counting because election code doesn’t specify minimum distance needed. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

He concluded by saying this case belonged in State Court and called for the dismissal “please please please dismiss this case so we can move on.” According to producer @CourtCrawfFNC . — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

of Supreme Court's opinion, which he says he does not believe Giuliani read. "Mr. Giuliani is talking about another case. Not the case before your honor." He made dozens of points spanning roughly forty minutes. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

After technical issues - Mark Aronchick, the attorney for the Allegheny County Board of Elections made his argument. Mr. Aronchick delivered a passionate argument via phone call slamming Mr. Giuliani’s argument saying what he is "waving around" today are "irrelevant" because — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

RT @JenGriffinFNC: Just moments after the Acting Defense Secretary announced US troop withdrawals, 4 rockets were fired at the US Embassy i… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Retweet Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

This is a defeat for the Trump campaign and TBD how this will affect the current federal court hearing where a big part of Rudy Giuliani’s opening argument was predicated on this claim republican pollwatchers were given a lack of meaningful access to the mail ballot counting. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court rules 5-2 that Philadelphia Board of Elections did not break the law by keeping poll-watchers - from both parties - a certain distance away from the mail in ballot counting because election code does not specify minimum distance observers need to be. https://t.co/v2QoaieBuH — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

In separate case - Pennsylvania Supreme Court just ruled against Trump Campaign - 5 to 2 - on issue of whether republican observers were given meaningful access to mail in ballot counts. https://t.co/H2IiF7GQHc — PolitiTweet.org

Adam Bonin @adambonin

In a 5-2 decision this afternoon, the @SupremeCtofPA has ruled that Phila Bd of Elections acted properly in setting… https://t.co/46PgkLJyz4

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

RT @TreyYingst: BREAKING: Multiple rockets fired towards the US embassy in Baghdad — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Retweet Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Update: — PolitiTweet.org

Zoe Tillman @ZoeTillman

The PA court posted on its website that it's aware the line cut out and is "working feverishly to restore access" https://t.co/ghjkxCStKM

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Anddddddd now audio from inside the courtroom has turned to white noise...as 3,999 people / journalists on the line eagerly hope that it comes back. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Donovan in a nutshell about Giuliani / Trump Campaign’s case in Pennsylvania. “Your honor, it’s just speculation.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Donovan is making a four part argument about how Giuliani/Trump Campaign claims don’t belong in federal court, are not constitutional issues, and that their allegations have not led to actual or imminent injuries - merely hypothetical and speculative injuries against voters. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Secretary of State’s attorney Daniel T. Donovan is now making case that this case has no legal standing in federal court and do not represent equal protection constitutional violations. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani claims Trump Campaign has 300 affidavits or declarations as proof - he says - Republican pollwatchers were kept too far away from observing mail ballots being counted in Philadephia and Pittsburgh. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani introduces photos as evidence in court. Exhibit A/B photos of poll-watchers being kept 20-30 feet away from closest mail in ballot counting table in Philadelphia. Exhibit C is a photo of young woman having to use binoculars to observe count in Pittsburgh. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani claims Trump Campaign has 300 affidavits or declarations as proof - he says - Republican pollwatchers were kept too far away from observing mail ballots being counted in Philadephia and Pittsburgh. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Deleted
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani argues Republican controlled counties did not give voters chance to cure/fix errors on mail ballots. Democratic counties did, he claims voters were "discriminated based on their location...which means you were denied your right to vote." — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani tells court that the 10 democratic cities nationwide “in an “eerily similar pattern. “ “Trashed. Stepped all over. Disregarded” poll watcher observer rules. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

He then cites the Carter/Baker Commission report on election reform quoting report which said “mail in balloting is the largest source of voter fraud.” — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Giuliani begins “the best description of this situation is widespread nationwide voter fraud...this is not an isolated case.” He argues the pandemic was an opportunity for Dems in nationwide to institute wide scale mail in ballot process. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

Federal court oral arguments begin in Pennsylvania as Rudy Giuliani - representing the Trump campaign - attempts to block the official certification of President-elect Joe Biden as winner of Pennsylvania claiming mail in voting system was unconstitutional. — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

In preparation for 1:30pm federal court hearing about Pennsylvania election: Trump Campaign’s case for why election results should not be officially certified: https://t.co/MevD8SeMy7 Secretary of State on why lawsuit is meritless and should be dropped: https://t.co/M2aSAX5FZZ — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Hibernated
Profile Image

Bryan Llenas @BryanLlenas

RT @dcexaminer: Pennsylvania is not sufficient to changing that outcome for @realDonaldTrump. But without it, he has no viable path to a… — PolitiTweet.org

Posted Nov. 17, 2020 Retweet Hibernated